Flyer

Health Science Journal

  • ISSN: 1108-7366
  • Journal h-index: 51
  • Journal CiteScore: 10.69
  • Journal Impact Factor: 9.13
  • Average acceptance to publication time (5-7 days)
  • Average article processing time (30-45 days) Less than 5 volumes 30 days
    8 - 9 volumes 40 days
    10 and more volumes 45 days
Awards Nomination 20+ Million Readerbase
Indexed In
  • Genamics JournalSeek
  • China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI)
  • CiteFactor
  • CINAHL Complete
  • Scimago
  • Electronic Journals Library
  • Directory of Research Journal Indexing (DRJI)
  • EMCare
  • OCLC- WorldCat
  • University Grants Commission
  • Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research
  • Euro Pub
  • Google Scholar
  • SHERPA ROMEO
  • Secret Search Engine Labs
Share This Page

Abstract

In Search for the Truth about Hydroxychloroquine Prophylaxis of Covid-19

Elena Filipova, Elitsa Gotseva, Katya Uzunova, Velichka Pavlova, Silvia Hristova and Toni Vekov

Introduction: COVID-19, caused by the coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 has quickly spread around the world. Currently there is an active search for vaccines and therapeutics, including repurposing of well-known drugs. COVID-19 continues to be a challenge with only a few therapeutic and no chemoprophylactic interventions to combat the virus.

Methods: We aimed to review available data for the application of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) as a chemoprophylactic agent for COVID-19, outline weakness of published trials and assess the objectivity of conclusions regarding the possible benefits of HCQ prophylaxis against the novel coronavirus disease.

Results: Our search turned 15 articles describing trials investigating the application of HCQ as a chemoprophylactic agent for COVID-19. Different cohorts of subjects were used, mainly health care workers exposed to coronavirus patients; people with rheumatic arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus; cases of household transmission.

Conclusions: Trials investigating the potential of HCQ to be a prophylactic agent for SARS-CoV-2 have quite conflicting results. Further research is required in the form of large randomized trials with carefully considered methodological approach which will help avoid limitations making the potential results unreliable.