Flyer

Journal of Universal Surgery

  • ISSN: 2254-6758
  • Journal h-index: 6
  • Journal CiteScore: 0.94
  • Journal Impact Factor: 0.82
  • Average acceptance to publication time (5-7 days)
  • Average article processing time (30-45 days) Less than 5 volumes 30 days
    8 - 9 volumes 40 days
    10 and more volumes 45 days
Awards Nomination 20+ Million Readerbase
Indexed In
  • Genamics JournalSeek
  • Directory of Research Journal Indexing (DRJI)
  • OCLC- WorldCat
  • Euro Pub
  • Google Scholar
  • J-Gate
  • SHERPA ROMEO
  • International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
  • Zenodo
Share This Page

Abstract

OSAS Surgery and Postoperative Inconvenience: Stage I Surgery versus Stage II Surgery

Gasparini Giulio*

This think about points to examine the reasons that debilitate the patients influenced by OSAS to experience orthognathic surgery and compares the postoperative distress of stage I (delicate tissue surgery) and stage II (orthognathic surgery) methods for treatment of OSAS. Fabric and Strategies . A pool of 46 patients influenced by OSAS was partitioned into two bunches: “surgery patients” who acknowledged surgical medications of their condition and “no surgery patients” who denied surgical methods. The “surgery patients” bunch was assist subdivided into two arms: patients who acknowledged stage I methods (IP) and those who acknowledged stage II (IIP). To way better get it the inspirations behind the refusal of II stage strategies, we inquired the patients having a place to both the IP gather and “no surgery” gather to show the most reason that impacted their choice to maintain a strategic distance from II stage methods. We moreover checked and compared five parameters of postoperative distress: torment, painkiller presumption.

Keywords

Surgical; Painkiller; Edema; Apnea; Distress

Published Date: 2023-01-31; Received Date: 2023-01-01