International Journal of Drug Development and Research

  • ISSN: 0975-9344
  • Journal h-index: 51
  • Journal CiteScore: 46.50
  • Journal Impact Factor: 26.99
  • Average acceptance to publication time (5-7 days)
  • Average article processing time (30-45 days) Less than 5 volumes 30 days
    8 - 9 volumes 40 days
    10 and more volumes 45 days
Awards Nomination 20+ Million Readerbase
Indexed In
  • Genamics JournalSeek
  • China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI)
  • CiteFactor
  • Scimago
  • Directory of Research Journal Indexing (DRJI)
  • OCLC- WorldCat
  • Publons
  • MIAR
  • University Grants Commission
  • Euro Pub
  • Google Scholar
  • J-Gate
  • Secret Search Engine Labs
  • ResearchGate
  • International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
Share This Page

Review - (2022) Volume 14, Issue 12

A Review on Sustained Release Matrix Tablet of Antihypertensive Drug

Arvind Raghav1*, Ashish Singh Chauhan2, Anil Kumar3, Km. Anjali4, Hareem Fatima5 and Km. Kalpana6
1Assistant Professor, R.S.D. Academy, College of Pharmacy, Moradabad-244001, Uttar Pradesh, India
2Assistant Professor, R.S.D. Academy, College of Pharmacy, Moradabad - 244001, Uttar Pradesh, India
3Assistant Professor MET Faculty of Pharmacy, Moradabad - 244001, Uttar Pradesh, India
4Assistant Professor, R.S.D. Academy, College of Pharmacy, Moradabad - 244001, Uttar Pradesh, India
5Assistant Professor, R.S.D. Academy, College of Pharmacy, Moradabad - 244001, Uttar Pradesh, India
6Assistant Professor, Maharaja Agrasen, College of Pharmacy, Amroha, Uttar Pradesh, India
*Correspondence: Arvind Raghav, Assistant Professor, R.S.D. Academy, College of Pharmacy, Moradabad-244001, Uttar Pradesh, India, Email:

Received: 29-Nov-2022, Manuscript No. IJDDR-22-13215; Editor assigned: 02-Dec-2022, Pre QC No. PQ-13215; Reviewed: 14-Dec-2022, QC No. IJDDR-22-13215; Revised: 22-Dec-2022, Manuscript No. IJDDR-22-13215 (R); Published: 30-Dec-2022, DOI: 10.36648-0975-9344-14.12-983


Now, the daily pharmaceutical industry is focused on developing common oral dosage forms as it becomes an essential medical tool. This continuous-release formulation does design to release the drug at a predetermined rate and to keep the plasma drug overflow in a medical window with minimal side effects. The basic idea behind continuous drug delivery is to change the drug's biopharmaceutical, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamics to reduce side effects, provide patient compliance, and treat the disease. Continued discontinuation of drug delivery improved patient compliance due to frequent drug administration, decreased flexibility in consistent drug levels, higher drug use, increased dosage of effective drug dosage, and reduced health care costs with improved treatment and shorter treatment duration. The main goal of the continuous-release forms is the development of drug treatment that has tested the relationship between the benefits and disadvantages of using a constant-release system. This review article contained basic information on the matrix type of the ongoing drug delivery system. Nowadays, there are very few drugs out of research and development, and existing drugs have a problem with resistance due to their unreasonable use, especially in the case of drugs such as antibiotics. Therefore, the mutation is an effective and efficient way to make a particular medication more effective with a slight change in drug delivery. Continuous extraction also provides a promising way to reduce the side effects of the drug by preventing fluctuations in the drug's therapeutic effect on the body. Drug administration through such a system involves controlled dispersal and distribution methods. If not correctly formulated, many medications can release the drug very quickly and may produce the drug's toxic effects orally. This article carries basic information about the structure of the release version and various similar types.

Keywords: Sustained Release; Matrix Tablet; Oral Drug Delivery System; Antihypertensive Drugs


The oral route is the most popular method used in drug administration due in part to the ease of administration and the fact that the physiology of the intestines provides greater flexibility in forming volume form than many other routes [1]. Terms of stable release, long-term release, modified release, extended-release, or depot formation do use to identify drug delivery systems designed to achieve or extend the effect of continuous treatment by over-the-counter medications after single-dose administration [2].

The benefits of providing a single dose of a long-acting drug instead of multiple quantities have been evident in the pharmaceutical industry for a long time. The desire to maintain a blood level close to or similar to the drug often translates into better patient compliance, as well as the improved clinical efficacy of the drug in its intended use [3]. Because of the growing problems and costs involved in advertising for new drug companies, much attention does focus on developing continuous or controlled drug delivery systems [4]. The matrix system does widely used for constant release. It is a release system that expands and prevents the release of a dispersed or dispersed drug. A matrix does define as a well-mixed combination of one or more drugs containing a gelling agent, i.e., hydrophilic polymers [5]. The purpose of an extended-release dosage form is to maintain the level of the drug in the plasma for a long time.

Advantages Sustained Release Drug Delivery System [6]

Clinical Advantages

Reduce the frequency of drug administration

Improved patient compliance

Decreased fluctuations in drug levels

Reduction of total drug use compared to conventional treatment

Reduce drug overdose through chronic treatment

Reduction of drug toxicity (area/system)

Stability of medical condition (due to similar drug levels)

Improving the availability of bioavailability of certain drugs due to local control

Economics for health care providers and patient

Commercial / Industrial Advantages

Product life-cycle extension

Product differentiation

Market Expansion

Patent extension

Disadvantages of Sustained Release Drug Delivery System [6]

Delay in the onset of drug action.

Possibility of volume disposal in the case of incorrect design strategy.

Increased chances of exceeding initial metabolism.

Significant dependence on the G.I. duration of the dose form.

Opportunities for slightly more accurate dose adjustment in some cases.

The cost per unit volume is higher compared to the standard books.

Not all medications are suitable for inclusion in the E.R. dosage form

Specific Considerations for the Formation of Sustained Release Formulation [7]

It is stored alone if an active compound has a long half-life (more than 6 hours).

If the pharmacological activity of an active compound is not related to its blood levels, the release time is meaningless.

If the absorption of an active compound involves an active transport, the development of a timely product may be problematic.

Finally, if an active compound has a shorter half-life; it will require a significant amount to maintain a more extended working capacity. In this case, a comprehensive treatment window does need to avoid poisoning; otherwise, the risk is unnecessary, which another management approaches recommends.

The Goal in Designing Delayed-Release Sustained or Controlled Delivery System [8]

Reduce dosing frequency or increase the drug's effectiveness by making a place in the action area, reducing the required dose, or providing a similar drug delivery.

It can be a single dose during treatment regardless of the days or weeks, such as infection, or lifelong patients, such as hypertension or diabetes.

It should bring the active business directly into the action area, reducing or eliminating adverse effects.

It may need to be delivered to specific receptors or localized to cells or particular areas of the body. The safety limit for solid drugs increased, and the incidence of adverse local and systemic side effects was reduced in critical patients.

Antihypertensive Drug

Hypertension is an increase in BP > 140/90 mmHg. It could be mild, moderate, or severe. Prolonged hypertension damages the blood vessels of the heart, brain, and kidneys leading to complications.

As per JNC recommendation, blood pressure may be classified as:

Normal (SBP<120 and DBP <80mmHg)

Prehypertension (SBP 120-139 and 80-89 mmHg)

Stage 1 hypertension (SBP 140-159 and 90-99 mmHg)

Stage 2 hypertension (SBP >160 and >130 mmHg)


(a) Diuretics

Thiazides (e.g., Indapamide, Hydrochlorothiazide)

Loop Diuretics (e.g., Furosemide)

Potassium Sparing Diuretics (e.g., Spironolactone)

(b) Drugs Acting on Renin-Angiotensin System

ACE Inhibitors (e.g., Captopril, Lisinopril, Enalapril)

ARBs (e.g., Losartan, Valsartan, Candesartan)

Renin Inhibitors (e.g., Aliskiren)

(c) Sympatholytics

Centrally Acting Drugs

Ganglion Blockers

Adrenergic Neuron Blockers

Adrenergic Receptor Blockers (Alpha Blockers, Beta Blockers)

Mixed Alpha and Beta Blockers

(d) Calcium Channel Blockers (e.g. Nifedipine, Verapamil, Amlodipine)

(e) Vasodilators

Arteriolar Dilators (e.g., Diazoxide, Hydralazine)

Arteriolar And Venular Dilators (e.g., Sodium nitroprusside)

Modified Release Drug Delivery System [9]

Extended-Release System

Drug delivery system that allows at least double the dose compared to that drug introduced as an immediate-release program.

The Process of Continuous Release

It includes any drug delivery system that gains a slow release of the drug in the long run and not, especially at a predetermined price.

Controlled Release System

Includes any drug delivery system in which a drug delivers at a predetermined price over a long period.

Long-Term Discharge Plan

It does design to release the drug slowly and provide continuous drug delivery over the long term.

The Release System Is Delayed

It is a program designed to release a different drug component at one time or another immediately after administration, alt. However, the piece may be removed immediately after administering the dosage form.

Biological Factors Affecting Design of Oral Sustained Release Dosage Form [9]

Biological Half-Life

A drug with a biological half-life of 2-8 hours does consider a suitable candidate for the dosage form, as this may reduce the dosage frequency. However, this is limited to drugs with a shorter half-life that may require an excessive amount of the drug per unit dose to maintain continuous results, forcing the dosage form to be relatively limited. The medication usually has a shorter halflife than 2 hours for poor people with ongoing relief programs.


The level, dosage, and consistency of the absorption of a drug are important factors when considering its composition in an extended-release system. The most important in the case of oral control is s Kr <<< Ka. If the drug absorbed by active transport or transport is limited to a specific area of GIT, this drug is a poor candidate for continuous-release systems. Considering that the drug delivery duration in the abdomen's suction area is between 9-12 hours, the maximum absorption of half-life should be 3-4 hours. It is in line with the minimum constant absorption rate of the Ka value of 0.17- 0.23 / hrs. required by about 80-95% absorption during a 9–12-hour transport time. In drugs with a shallow absorption rate (of << 0.17 / hrs.), the initial order release rate of less than 0.17 /hrs. Results in a bioavailability that is unacceptable in most patients. Therefore, the slow-release drug will be challenging to develop into extended-release systems where the Kr <<< Ka condition must meet.


Metabolism leads to an active drug's inactivity or an inactive molecule. Metabolic modification of the drug occurs mainly in the liver. Metabolism does characterize by consistent metabolism or the appearance of a metabolite. As long as the rate and rate of metabolism predict, this is appropriately incorporated into the product structure. However, complex metabolic patterns make formation more difficult, especially if the biological activity does require metabolite. Suppose a drug in chronic treatment ingests or shows an enzyme concentration. In that case, it will make the person very poor to produce a continuous product due to the difficulty of maintaining the same blood level.

Therapeutic Index

It does widely used to measure the safety limit of a drug. TI = TD50 / ED50. If the T.I. value is long, it is a safe drug. Drugs with shallow therapeutic value are poor preservatives developed into long-acting products. The drug does consider safe if its T.I. level is above 10.

Physiological Factors Affecting Design of Oral Sustained Release Dosage Form [9]

Molecular Weight and Diffusivity For drug absorption, it is necessary to spread a wide range of biological membranes during its duration. In addition to the distribution of these physical layers, drugs in many controlled release systems must apply through the membrane that controls the polymeric level or matrix. Drugs weighing 150-400 cells are good candidates for continuous dosage forms. For drugs with a molecular weight greater than 500Da, their distribution coefficients in many polymers are usually so small that they are challenging to measure.

Dosage size for standard dosage forms, the dosage size of 500- 1000 mg is the highest appropriate dose for continuous dosage forms.

Aqueous Soluble A portion of a drug absorbed into the bloodstream is a function of the value of a drug in the solution of the G.I. tract, i.e., penetration into the drug. For the drug to be absorbed, it must be dispersed in a liquid phase around the treatment area and separated from the permeable membrane. Therefore, a tree's aqueous solubility does use as an initial measure of its completion rate. Low-aqueous soluble drugs have low melting levels and often have oral bioavailability problems. The minimum melting point of the drug is 0.1 mg/ml for continuous extraction. Good aqueous-soluble drugs are ideal candidates for the development of constant oral release.

Partition coefficient (K) Drugs with high K levels are highly soluble in oil, break down into membranes easily, and remain in the body for a long time. High K values positively affect poor water solubility but improve lipid solubility, and the drug will not separate the lipid membrane once it has entered. The K value at which the maximum activity does estimate at 1000/1 in n. -octanol/water. Drugs with a partition coefficient higher or lower than, in general, poor people to be produced into a dosage form for extended release.

Drug Stability In those conservative medicines, the most effective control unit may be those that release only its intestinal contents. Release in the case of those dangerous drugs in the intestinal tract; the most appropriate control may be to remove its contents only in the stomach. Therefore, for drugs with serious stability problems in any area of G.I., the pamphlet is less suitable for designing controlled output systems that deliver the same content over the GIT length (Table 1). Physicochemical Parameters for Drug Selection)).

Parameters Preferred value
Molecular weight/ size < 1000
Solubility > 0.1 µg/ml for pH 1 to pH 7.8
Apparent partition coefficient High
General absorbability From all G.I. segments
Release Should not be influenced by pH and enzymes
Elimination half-life Preferably between 0.5-8 hours
Total clearance Should not be dose-dependent
The apparent volume of distribution Vd The larger the Vd and MEC, the larger the required dose size.
Absolute bioavailability It should be 75% or more.
Intrinsic absorption rate It must be more significant than the release rate
Dose size 0.5-1 gm
Partition Coefficient High partition coefficient
Stability Drugs should be stable in the intestine.
Metabolism Drugs should not undergo First-pass metabolism.
Therapeutic Index Should have a wide range of therapeutic index
BCS Class BCS Class I and II are suitable for CR/ SR formulation development

Table 1: Physicochemical Parameters for Drug Selection.

Matrix Type of Sustained Release Drug Delivery System [9]

The process by which drug molecules are dissolved or dispersed in a bio-compatible polymer produces the same device as drug molecules spread uniformly throughout. In this case, the drug molecules release by spraying the polymer on the surface of the device, where they are cast on the outer surface (Figure 1). Schematic of matrix-type systems for controlled drug delivery. Matrix delivery systems construct with drugs dissolved in the matrix material (a) or Particles of the drug dispersed to form a composite material (b and c).


Figure 1: Schematic of matrix-type systems for controlled drug delivery. Matrix delivery systems can be constructed with drugs dissolved in the matrix material (a) or Particles of drug dispersed to form a composite material (b and c).

Advantages of Matrix System

Their production is expensive and does not require particular infrastructure.

The drug can be protected from the acidic environment of the gastrointestinal tract, thereby increasing its stability.

Improvement of patient compliance by reducing the frequency of dosing.

Reduce drug accumulation and related side effects.

Disadvantages of Matrix System

The zero-order release of a drug is often difficult to achieve.

Drug withdrawal can be affected by physiological factors, the presence of food, the timing of abortion, and bowel movements.

Classification of Matrix Tablets

Based on Retardant Material Used Hydrophobic Matrices (Plastic matrices)

Stable emissions do produce due to the dissolving solvent distributed through a network of existing channels between the composite polymer particles. In this method of obtaining continuous release in oral dosage form, the drug is mixed with an inert or hydrophobic polymer and pressed into the tablet. Examples of materials used as inert or hydrophobic matriculates include polyethylene, polyvinyl chloride, ethyl cellulose, and acrylate polymers and their copolymers. Such matrix pills become idle in the presence of water and intestinal fluid—a step to control the level of this formation of fluid infiltration into the matrix. A possible way of drug withdrawal from such types of pills is distribution [10].

Lipid Matrices

These matrices do prepare by lipid wax and related substances. Drug release in such matrices occurs in both the distribution of pores and erosion. Extrusion elements are therefore more sensitive to forming digestive fluids than to an insoluble polymer matrix. Carnauba wax mixed with stearyl alcohol or stearic acid does use as a discarded base in many continuous products.

Hydrophilic Matrices

Hydrophilic polymer matrix systems do widely use in the delivery of oral contraceptives due to their flexibility in obtaining the desired drug release profile, cost-effectiveness, and wide acceptance of control. Drug formulation in gelatinous capsules or tablets using high-strength gelling hydrophilic polymers as base excipients with a particular interest in the field of controlled release. An infection matrix does define as a well-mixed compound of one or more chemicals containing a gelling agent (hydrophilic polymer). These systems are called swellable controlled release systems. The polymers used in the preparation of hydrophilic matrices do divide into three broad groups.

Cellulose Derivatives: Methylcellulose 400 and 4000cPs, Hydroxy ethyl cellulose; Hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose (HPMC) 25, 100, 4000, and 15000cPs; and Sodium carboxy methyl cellulose.

Non-Cellulose Natural or Semi-Synthetic Polymers: Agar-Agar; Carob gum; Alginates; Molasses; Polysaccharides of mannose and galactose, Chitosan, and Modified starches.

Polymers of Acrylic Acid: Carbopol- 934, is the most used variety [11].

Biodegradable Matrices

These include polymers that combine monomers connected by functional groups and unstable connections to the spine. They are biologically damaged or degraded by enzymes produced by surrounding living cells or by a non-enzymatic process to oligomers and monomers that can be modified or extracted. Examples are natural polymers such as proteins and polysaccharides; natural polymers replaced; polymers produced as aliphatic poly (esters) and poly anhydrides [12].

Mineral Matrices

These include polymers found in various types of seaweed. E.g., Alginic acid is a hydrophilic carbohydrate found in brown seaweed species (Phaeophyceae) through refined alkali [13].

Based on the Porosity of Matrix [13]

The matrix system divides according to its porosity, and as a result, Macro porous, Microporous and Non-porous systems identify.

Macro-Porous Systems: In such systems, the diffusion of the drug occurs through pores of the matrix, which are in the size range of 0.1 to 1μm. This pore size is larger than the diffusion molecule size.

Micro-Porous System: Diffusion in this type of system occurs essentially through pores. For microporous systems, pore size ranges between 50–200 A°, slightly larger than diffusion molecule size.

Non-Porous System: Non-porous systems have no pores, and the molecules diffuse through the network meshes. Only the polymeric phase exists in this case, and no pore phase is present.

Polymers Used in Matrix Tablet [14]

Polymers Use for Sustained Release Tablet (Table 2).

Mechanism of Drug Release from Matrix System [14]

Many extended-release preparations are available, none working in a single drug delivery system. Drug extraction from controlled devices is by dispersing or combining a two-way or erosioncontrolled system.

Diffusion-Controlled system [15]

In this type of system, the step control level is not the dispersion rate but the dispersion of the dispersed drug using a polymeric barrier. The drug release rate never orders zero as the length of the distribution process increases over time as the insoluble matrix gradually decreases the drug. The two types of distributed control systems are:

1. Matrix Diffusion-Controlled System

2. Reservoir Devices

In the matrix system, the tree disperses as solid particles within a matrix with holes made of a water-soluble polymer, such as polyvinyl chloride. Initially, the particles of the drug in the upper part of the release unit will dissolve, and the drug will be released immediately. After that, the wood particles at a straight distance from the top of the extracted team will be dispersed and removed by scattering holes to the outside of the release unit. This process pursues the interface between the bath solution and the solid wood that goes inside.

Dissolution Controlled System

A tree with a low degradation rate will show supporting properties, as the release of the drug will be determined by the level of dissolution. It seems possible to adjust the increased product release by reducing the elimination rate of highly soluble drugs in water. It can be done by:

Preparation of suitable salt or from it.

Cover the tree with a slightly soluble melt control.

Applying the drug to the tablet with the carrier–matrix dissolution. (To drug withdrawal rates continue to decline over time ) [16].

Schematic representation of dissolution-controlled release systems (a) matrix system and (b) coated/encapsulated system (Figure 3).


Figure 2: Schematic for the echanism of drug release from a diffusion-based matrix tablet. Obviously, for this system to be diffusion controlled, the rate of dissolution of drug particles within the matrix must be faster than the diffusion rate of the dissolved drug leaving the matrix.

Hydrophilic Polymers Water Insoluble and Hydrophobic Fatty Acids/Alcohols/Waxes
Cellulosic Non-Cellulosic Non-Cellulosic (others)
Methylcellulose Sodium alginate Polyethene oxide Ethylcellulose Bees’ wax
HPC Xanthan gum Homopolymers and copolymers of acrylic acid Hypromellose acetate succinate Candelilla wax
HPMC carrageenan   Cellulose acetate Candelilla wax
HEC Gaur gum CAP Paraffin waxes
Na-CMC Locust bean gum Methacrylic acid copolymers Cetyl alcohol
Chitosan PVA Stearyl alcohol

Table 2: Polymers Use for Sustained Release Tablet. international-journal-dissolution

Figure 3: Schematic Representation of dissolution-controlled release systems (a) matrix system and (b) coated/encapsulated system.

Erosion Controlled Systems

In an extended erosion-controlled release system, the drug release rate does control by the erosion of the matrix in which the drug disperses. The drug is then diluted with gastric juice and mixed (if the drug dissolves in the matrix) or distributed in (if the medication does suspend in the matrix) fluid. This drug withdrawal program is simplistic, as the erosion process may involve a different approach to drug withdrawal. For example, a tree may be free from erosion and distribution within the matrix. However, drug withdrawal may generally limit zero-order to a significant portion of the total release time. The eroding matrix can make of different materials. One example is lipids or waxes, where the drug does disperse. Another example is a polymer, a gel that comes in contact with water (e.g. Hydroxyethylcellulose). The gel will then erode and release the dissolved or dispersed substance into the gel [17-19].

Schematic illustration of the mechanism of drug release from an erosion tablet (Figure 4).


Figure 4: Schematic illustration of the mechanism of drug release from an erosion tablet.


SRDDS is usually frightened by an effective drug Discovery to obtain the highest dose and dosage of the drug Absorption; however, it controls drug action by construction and means controlling the bioavailability to lower the drug Absorption rates. Oral dosage forms indicate one of these Leading areas of the ongoing drug delivery system (SRDDS). S.R. builds help increase the Efficiency of volume and ease of use due to common drugs to manage. SRDDS may be used to deliver drugs at a continuous rate over 24 hours. The volume form composition is an excellent way to provide medication to control treatment—the effect on the surface of uncertain Vivo variables The place where the drug release occurred. The current overview also provides insight into the technology of various trading platforms, drug conditions Selection, development of novel research, and SRDDS patents. In the future, the design of oral S.R. products will use to get what all want, the level of access to the drug in the form of continuous action dose. They include increasing the particle size, embedding the Medicine in a matrix, a drug cover, or an amount containing a drug or microencapsulation to form drug structures with Substances such as ion exchange resins. S.R. format is easy Improvement and more effective when antibiotics are introduced in the same absurd use that is likely to result in resistance. Own effort will find a new application or system soon.


  1. Altaf AS, Friend DR, Rathbone MJ, Hadgraft J, Robert MS (2003) MASRx and COSRx Sustained-Release Technology in Modified Release Drug Delivery Technology. Marcel Dekker Inc N Y 126: 996-1120.
  2. Google Scholar

  4. Banker S G, Rhodes TC (2002) Modern Pharmaceutics. Marcel Dekker Inc   575-590.
  5. Google Scholar

  6. Donald LW (2000) Handbook of Pharmaceutical Controlled Release Technology. Marcel Dekker Inc N Y 432-460.
  7. Google Scholar

  8. Dr Brahmankar DM, Dr Jaiswal SB (1995) Biopharmaceutics and Pharmacokinetics–A Treatise. ND 349-352.
  9. Google Scholar

  10. GD Gothi, BN Parinh, TD Patel (2010) Copolymerization of N-vinyl carbazole and methyl methacrylate onto cellulose acetate film, J Global Pharma Techno 2(2): 69-74.
  11. Google Scholar

  12. Gupta PK and Robinson JR (1992) Oral controlled release delivery. Treatise on controlled drug delivery 93(2): 545-555.
  13. Google Scholar

  14. Gwen MJ, Joseph RR (1996) In Banker G.S. and Rhodes CT, Eds. Modern Pharmaceutics, Marcel Dekker Inc. New York, 72(3): 575-590.
  18. Salsa T, Veiga F, Pina ME (1997) Oral controlled release dosage form. I. cellulose ether polymers in hydrophilic matrices. Drug Develop Ind Pharm 23: 929-938.
  19. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  20. Sandip B Tiwari, Ali R, Rajabi-Siahboomi (2010) Extended-Release Oral Drug Delivery Technologies: Monolithic Matrix Systems. Methods Mol Bio 437: 217-243.
  21. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  26. IN Sayed, MM Gamal, EL Badry (2009) Preparation and comparative evaluation of sustained-release metoclopramide hydrochloride matrix tablets. Saudi Pharmaceutical J 17: 283-288.
  27. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref


Citation: Raghav A, Chauhan AS, Kumar A, Anjali KM, Fatima H, et al. (2022) A Review on Sustained Release Matrix Tablet of Antihypertensive Drug. Int J Drug Dev Res J, Vol. 14 No. 12: 983.