Flyer

Translational Biomedicine

  • ISSN: 2172-0479
  • Journal h-index: 18
  • Journal CiteScore: 5.91
  • Journal Impact Factor: 4.11
  • Average acceptance to publication time (5-7 days)
  • Average article processing time (30-45 days) Less than 5 volumes 30 days
    8 - 9 volumes 40 days
    10 and more volumes 45 days
Awards Nomination 20+ Million Readerbase
Indexed In
  • Open J Gate
  • Genamics JournalSeek
  • JournalTOCs
  • ResearchBible
  • The Global Impact Factor (GIF)
  • China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI)
  • CiteFactor
  • Scimago
  • Electronic Journals Library
  • Directory of Research Journal Indexing (DRJI)
  • OCLC- WorldCat
  • Proquest Summons
  • Publons
  • MIAR
  • University Grants Commission
  • Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research
  • Euro Pub
  • Google Scholar
  • SHERPA ROMEO
  • Secret Search Engine Labs
  • ResearchGate
  • International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
Share This Page

Short Communication - (2016) Volume 7, Issue 2

A Translational Biomedical Approach to Structural Arrangement of Amino Acids Complexes: A Combined Theoretical and Computational Study

A Heidari*

Faculty of Chemistry, California South University, 14731 Comet St. Irvine, CA 92604, USA

*Corresponding Author:
A Heidari
Faculty of Chemistry, California South University (CSU), 14731 Comet St. Irvine, CA 92604, USA
Tel: +1 (775) 410-4974
E-mail: Scholar.Researcher.Scientist@gmail.com

Received date: May 23, 2016; Accepted date: May 30, 2016; Published date: Jun 07, 2016

Citation: A Heidari. A Translational Biomedical Approach to Structural Arrangement of Amino Acids’ Complexes: A Combined Theoretical and Computational Study. Transl Biomed. 2016, 7:2.

Visit for more related articles at Translational Biomedicine

Abstract

In this short communication, respectively bonding among Boron (B3+), Aluminum (Al3+), Gallium (Ga3+), Indium (In3+) and Thallium (Tl3+) cations and Alanine, Arginine, Asparagine, Aspartic Acid, Cysteine, Glutamic Acid, Glutamine, Glycine, Proline, Selenocysteine, Serine, Tyrosine, Histidine, Isoleucine, Leucine, Lysine, Methionine, Phenylalanine, Threonine, Tryptophan and Valine ligands and also structural arrangement of the present compounds were studied, theoretically and computationally

Short Communication

In this short communication, respectively bonding among Boron (B3+), Aluminum (Al3+), Gallium (Ga3+), Indium (In3+) and Thallium (Tl3+) cations and Alanine, Arginine, Asparagine, Aspartic Acid, Cysteine, Glutamic Acid, Glutamine, Glycine, Proline, Selenocysteine, Serine, Tyrosine, Histidine, Isoleucine, Leucine, Lysine, Methionine, Phenylalanine, Threonine, Tryptophan and Valine ligands and also structural arrangement of the present compounds were studied, theoretically and computationally [1-16]. Calculations were done via HF, PM3, MM2, MM3, AM1, MP2, MP3, MP4, CCSD, CCSD(T), LDA, BVWN, BLYP and B3LYP computational methods with 31G, 6-31G*, 6-31+G*, 6-31G(3df,3pd), 6-311G, 6-311G* and 6– 311+G* basis sets, respectively. Alanine, Arginine, Asparagine, Aspartic Acid, Cysteine, Glutamic Acid, Glutamine, Glycine, Proline, Selenocysteine, Serine, Tyrosine, Histidine, Isoleucine, Leucine, Lysine, Methionine, Phenylalanine, Threonine, Tryptophan and Valine ligands are bonded to Boron (B3+), Aluminum (Al3+), Gallium (Ga3+), Indium (In3+) and Thallium (Tl3+) cations via Oxygen (O) and Nitrogen (N) atoms. It is evident that if Alanine, Arginine, Asparagine, Aspartic Acid, Cysteine, Glutamic Acid, Glutamine, Glycine, Proline, Selenocysteine, Serine, Tyrosine, Histidine, Isoleucine, Leucine, Lysine, Methionine, Phenylalanine, Threonine, Tryptophan and Valine ligands form complexes with Boron (B3+), Aluminum (Al3+), Gallium (Ga3+), Indium (In3+) and Thallium (Tl3+) cations, different isomers will be obtained. Energy of each of the isomers was optimized via HF, PM3, MM2, MM3, AM1, MP2, MP3, MP4, CCSD, CCSD(T), LDA, BVWN, BLYP and B3LYP computational methods with 31G, 6-31G*, 6-31+G*, 6-31G(3df,3pd), 6-311G, 6-311G* and 6-311+G* basis sets, respectively. The most stabilized isomers are complexes in which Boron (B3+), Aluminum (Al3+), Gallium (Ga3+), Indium (In3+) and Thallium (Tl3+) cations are bonded to Oxygen (O) in Carbonyl (C=O) group and Nitrogen (N) in Amide (R-CO-NR′R″) group in Alanine, Arginine, Asparagine, Aspartic Acid, Cysteine, Glutamic Acid, Glutamine, Glycine, Proline, Selenocysteine, Serine, Tyrosine, Histidine, Isoleucine, Leucine, Lysine, Methionine, Phenylalanine, Threonine, Tryptophan and Valine ligands. Then, numbers of Alanine, Arginine, Asparagine, Aspartic Acid, Cysteine, Glutamic Acid, Glutamine, Glycine, Proline, Selenocysteine, Serine, Tyrosine, Histidine, Isoleucine, Leucine, Lysine, Methionine, Phenylalanine, Threonine, Tryptophan and Valine ligands surrounding Boron (B3+), Aluminum (Al3+), Gallium (Ga3+), Indium (In3+) and Thallium (Tl3+) cations are increased. Energy of each of the resulting complexes was optimized via HF, PM3, MM2, MM3, AM1, MP2, MP3, MP4, CCSD, CCSD(T), LDA, BVWN, BLYP and B3LYP computational methods with 31G, 6-1G*, 6-31+G*, 6–31G(3df, 3pd), 6-311G, 6-311G* and 6–311+G* basis sets as mentioned above, respectively. Furthermore, stability energy of the complexes, bond lengths and also bond angles were investigated.

9653

References

  1. Andrew SM, Nagaraju A, Malena BR, Vassilios P (2015) Computational modeling and biological validation of novel non-steroidal ligands for the cholesterol recognition/interaction amino acid consensus (CRAC) motif of the mitochondrial translocator protein (TSPO) , Pharmacological Research 99: 393-403.
  2. Daniel Garcez SQ, Glaucio BF, Leonardo M da Costa, José Walkimar de MC (2016) DFT studies of the interactions between the [Ca(H2O)5]2+ cation and monofunctionaloxo, aza, sulfur and phosphorous ligands, Computational and Theoretical Chemistry 1075: 104-110.
  3. Marcos VMM, Daniel GS Quattrociocchi, Leonardo M Da Costa, Gláucio BF, José W de MC (2015) Computational study of the interaction between the [Pb(H2O)3]2+ cation and ligands containing oxygen, nitrogen and sulfur donor atoms, Polyhedron 102: 193-200.
  4. Bigler DJ, Peterson LW, Cafiero M (2015) Effects of implicit solvent and relaxed amino acid side chains on the MP2 and DFT calculations of ligand–protein structure and electronic interaction energies of dopaminergic ligands in the SULT1A3 enzyme active site, Computational and Theoretical Chemistry 1051: 79-92.
  5. Hellal A, Chafaa S, Chafai N (2016) Synthesis, characterization and computational studies of three α-amino- phosphonic acids derivatives from Meta, Ortho and Para aminophenol, Journal of Molecular Structure 1103: 110-124.
  6. Sardella R, Macchiarulo A, Carotti A, Ianni F, Rubiño MEG, et al. (2012) Chiral mobile phase in ligand-exchange chromatography of amino acids: Exploring the copper(II) salt anion effect with a computational approach, Journal of Chromatography A 1269: 316-324.
  7. Suncica ZB, Srdan DS (2013) Halogen bonding in complexes of proteins and non-natural amino acids, Computational Biology and Chemistry 47: 231-239.
  8. Cao H, Chen H, Cui Y, Tian H, Chen J (2016) Structure-based design and confirmation of peptide ligands for neuronal polo-like kinase to promote neuroregeneration, Computational Biology and Chemistry 61: 238-244.
  9. Katherine HA, Mallory Morris, Larryn WP, Cafiero M (2016) Ab initio study of electronic interaction energies and desolvation energies for dopaminergic ligands in the catechol-O-methyltransferase active site, Computational and Theoretical Chemistry 1078: 146-162.
  10. Natalini B, Marinozzi M, Sardella R, Macchiarulo A, Pellicciari R (2004) Evaluation of the enantiomeric selectivity in the chiral ligand-exchange chromatography of amino acids by a computational model, Journal of Chromatography A 1033: 363-367.
  11. Qin P, Zhang W, Lu W (2013) Theoretical study of hydrated Ca2+-amino acids (glycine, threonine and phenylalanine) clusters, Computational and Theoretical Chemistry 1021: 164-170.
  12. Philips A, Lach G, MBujnicki J (2015) Chapter Eleven-Computational Methods for Prediction of RNA Interactions with Metal Ions and Small Organic Ligands, In: Shi-Jie Chen and Donald H. Burke-Aguero, Editor(s) , Methods in Enzymology, Academic Press 553: 261-285.
  13. Natalini B, Giacche N, Sardella R, Ianni F, Macchiarulo A (2010) Computational studies for the elucidation of the enantiomer elution order of amino acids in chiral ligand-exchange chromatography, Journal of Chromatography A 1217: 7523-7527.
  14. Anighoro A, Graziani D, Bettinelli I, Cilia A, De Toma C, et al. (2015) Insights into the interaction of negative allosteric modulators with the metabotropic glutamate receptor 5: Discovery and computational modeling of a new series of ligands with nanomolar affinity, Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry 23: 3040-3058.
  15. Diana JB, Larryn WP, Mauricio Cafiero (2015) DFT and MP2 study of the effects of mutations on the binding of ligands within the SULT1A3 active site, Computational and Theoretical Chemistry 1068: 63-71.
  16. Santos HFD (2014) Reactivity of auranofin with S-, Se- and N-containing amino acids, Computational and Theoretical Chemistry 1048: 95-101.