Acta Rheumatologica

  • Journal h-index: 2
  • Journal CiteScore: 0.29
  • Journal Impact Factor: 0.67
  • Average acceptance to publication time (5-7 days)
  • Average article processing time (30-45 days) Less than 5 volumes 30 days
    8 - 9 volumes 40 days
    10 and more volumes 45 days
Awards Nomination 20+ Million Readerbase
Indexed In
  • OCLC- WorldCat
  • Publons
  • Google Scholar
  • Secret Search Engine Labs
  • International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
Share This Page

Mini Article - (2023) Volume 10, Issue 2

An Analysis for the Patients who Suffered by Metastatic Bone Disease

Itishree Badatya*
Department of Chemistry, Berhampur University, India
*Correspondence: Itishree Badatya, Department of Chemistry, Berhampur University, India, Email:

Received: 01-Apr-2023, Manuscript No. ipar-23-13727; Editor assigned: 03-Apr-2023, Pre QC No. ipar-23-13727(PQ); Reviewed: 17-Apr-2023, QC No. ipar-23-13727; Revised: 21-Apr-2023, Manuscript No. ipar-23-13727(R); Published: 28-Apr-2023, DOI: 10.36648/ipar.


In order to better understand Xgeva-treated treatment-emergent hypocalcemia in patients with bone metastases, this analysis was carried out. Data from three identically designed phase 3 trials of subcutaneous Xgeva 120 mg versus intravenous zoledronic acid 4 mg were used to analyze laboratory abnormalities and hypocalcaemiarelated adverse events in patients with metastatic bone disease. Xgeva was associated with a higher overall rate of laboratory manifestations of hypocalcaemia of grade 2 than zoledronic acid. In most cases, hypocalcaemia events of grade 2 severity occurred within the first six months of treatment. Patients who revealed taking calcium as well as vitamin D enhancements had a lower rate of hypocalcaemia. Significant risk factors for developing hypocalcaemia included prostate cancer or small-cell lung cancer, decreased creatinine clearance, and elevated baseline bone turnover markers of urinary N-telopeptide of type I collagen and bone-specific alkaline phosphatase values. Patients with more than two bone metastases at baseline were more likely to be at risk for elevated BSAP levels than those with fewer than two. Xgeva had a greater antiresorptive effect than zoledronic acid, as evidenced by its higher frequency of hypocalcaemia. Before beginning treatment with a powerful osteoclast inhibitor, low serum calcium levels and potential vitamin D deficiency should be corrected, and corrected serum calcium levels should be monitored throughout treatment. The risk of hypocalcaemia appears to be significantly reduced with adequate calcium and vitamin D intake.


Metastatic bone disease; Xgeva; Anti-resorptive effect; Zoledronic acid


During the course of their disease, many cancer patients experience bone metastases. Bone metastases upset the typical homeostasis between bone development and resorption by advancing osteoclast development and action and expanded bone resorption. Pathologic fracture, spinal cord compression, severe pain, and the requirement for skeletal radiation or surgery may all result from the shift toward increased bone resorption. Treatments for bone metastases that inhibit osteoclastic bone resorption also reduce the amount of skeletal calcium released into the bloodstream. Bisphosphonates taken orally and intravenously, as well as denosumab, an inhibitor of the receptor activator of the nuclear factor-kappa ligand, have been linked to hypocalcemia. Risk factors for hypocalcaemia incorporate osteoblastic metastases or broad osteoid, as in osteomalacia, the two of which might go about as a calcium sink. On antiresorptive therapy, hypocalcaemia has also been linked to concurrent corticosteroids and low baseline serum calcium concentrations [1].

Xgeva performed better than zoledronic acid in preventing SREs, according to a combined analysis of three phase 3 trials conducted on patients with metastatic bone disease. Overall, Xgeva and ZA shared similar safety profiles; Denosumab, on the other hand, was more likely to cause hypocalcemia. To further identify and characterize potential risk factors, this retrospective analysis assessed hypocalcaemia based on laboratory abnormalities and clinical evaluations collected during these trials.

Clinical analysis

From the date of onset of hypocalcaemia of grade 2 to the resolution date or to a lower level of hypocalcaemia, the duration of the first occurrence was calculated. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to estimate the median time it took for hypocalcaemia to first occur based on results from the central laboratory. Using a time-dependent Cox proportional hazards model, the risk of developing hypocalcaemia in denosumab-treated patients was assessed by supplementing with calcium and vitamin D during the study [2].

In both univariate and multivariate analyses, the baseline covariate significance of disease characteristics on the risk of developing grade 2 hypocalcaemia was evaluated using a Cox proportional hazards model. Cox proportional hazards models with the interaction term and the associated baseline covariates in separate models were used to investigate the interactions between corrected uNTx and the number of bone metastases and BSAP and the number of bone metastases [3].


Patients in each of the three trials were assigned to either ZA or denosumab. Patients who had on-study hypocalcemia and those who did not have it were generally similar at the baseline in both treatment groups. This analysis included 2841 and 2836 patients in the Xgeva and ZA groups, respectively, who received less than one dose of the study drug. Xgeva had a higher incidence of investigator-reported adverse events for hypocalcaemia than ZA did. Grade 2 hypocalcemia accounted for the majority of events; no lethal hypocalcaemia occasions happened during the preliminaries [4].

For both treatment groups, taking calcium and/or vitamin D supplements was associated with fewer adverse events caused by hypocalcemia. With denosumab, the gamble of fostering an AE of hypocalcaemia was 40% lower among patients who detailed taking enhancements contrasted and the individuals who didn't. For ZA, those who reported taking supplements had a 27% lower risk of developing hypocalcaemia than those who did not. Denosumab-treated patients experienced hypocalcemia earlier than ZA-treated patients did. The middle opportunity to 1st event of hypocalcaemia grade ⩾2 was 3.8 months with Xgeva and 6.5 months with ZA. In both groups, the median time from the onset of hypocalcemia of grade 3 was longer: 4.6 and 7.8 months in each case. The relating middle times to first event of an AE of hypocalcaemia were 2.8 and 3.5 months [5].

More than half of the 353 denosumab-treated hypocalcemia patients had prostate cancer. The majority of denosumab-treated patients and all tumor types experienced hypocalcemia AEs or grade 2 hypocalcemia for the first time less than six months after starting treatment; between the first and second doses, 20.4% of denosumab-treated patients and 16.1% of ZA-treated patients experienced grade 2 hypocalcemia. Hypocalcaemia for the most part settled by the following booked concentrate on visit. The first episode of hypocalcaemia lasted roughly three weeks on average, according to the beginning and end dates of the event-of-interest AEs. In a similar vein, denosumab’ s median duration for the onset of hypocalcaemia was 30 days, while ZA's was 29 days, according to the Kaplan–Meier estimate. Three of the 502 patients with grade 2 hypocalcemia left the study due to an adverse effect of hypocalcaemia [6].

Most patients with hypocalcaemia experienced only one hypocalcaemia episode; A recurrence occurred in 43% of denosumab-treated patients with hypocalcemia and 32% of ZA-treated patients with hypocalcemia. Among denosumab-treated patients, repeat rates were most elevated for those with prostate malignant growth and least for those with non-little cell cellular breakdown in the lungs.


According to laboratory results and adverse events, Xgeva recipients experienced more hypocalcemia than ZA recipients did. Denosumab-treated patients who reported taking calcium/vitamin D supplements had a 40% lower risk of hypocalcaemia AEs. Univariate examination recognized a few gamble factors related with the improvement of grade ⩾2 hypocalcaemia, including male sex, prostate malignant growth or SCLC, decreased creatinine freedom, higher gauge upsides of uNTx and BSAP, >2 bone metastases at standard, and osteoblastic sores. Prostate cancer or SCLC, decreased creatinine clearance, and higher baseline values of uNTx and BSAP were all found to be risk factors for hypocalcaemia in the multivariate analysis [7].

Xgeva and ZA inhibit bone resorption through distinct mechanisms. Importantly, denosumab’s hypocalcaemia risk factors were comparable to those previously associated with powerful bisphosphonates, including prostate cancer, renal impairment, and vitamin D deficiency. In our examination, calcium or potentially vitamin D supplementation whenever during Xgeva treatment essentially brought down the gamble of AEs of hypocalcaemia. Clinical AE reports, which only include symptomatic hypocalcaemia events, have been the primary source of information for previous analyses of hypocalcaemia in denosumab-treated cancer patients. A meta-analysis of data from seven randomised controlled trials revealed that Xgeva groups were more likely than control groups to experience adverse events related to hypocalcaemia. Using patient-level data from three identically designed trials, we analyzed laboratory events of hypocalcaemia, including non-symptomatic events [8].

In healthy individuals, osteoclast inhibition rarely results in clinically significant decreases in blood calcium. During antiresorptive therapy, clinically significant hypocalcemia is typically caused by insufficient vitamin D intake; deficient calcium admission; dysfunctional renal function; hyperparathyroidism; or then again broad osteoid because of high bone turnover, osteomalacia, fast skeletal development, or Paget infection. According to our analysis, patients who received Xgeva and developed hypocalcaemia had median baseline BSAP levels and higher uNTx levels than those who did not. After osteoclast inhibition, elevated BSAP levels may indicate potential calcium deposition in osteoid and under mineralized bone matrix, which can last for weeks or months. These findings suggest that when osteoclasts are inhibited, particularly when calcium and vitamin D intake is inadequate, patients with high bone turnover may be more susceptible to hypocalcaemia. The significance of calcium and vitamin D intake in compensating for antiresorptive-mediated reductions in bone resorption is supported by this observation [9].

Due to the kidney's role in compensating for decreased skeletal calcium mobilization, Xgeva had a lower incidence of hypocalcaemia in patients with normal baseline creatinine clearance. Osteoclast inhibition with Xgeva typically results in increased release of parathyroid hormone, and functionally impaired kidneys may be less able to respond to this PTH signal by producing active vitamin D. These studies did not measure serum calcitriol, but decreased intestinal calcium absorption by the kidneys could increase the risk of hypocalcaemia with antiresorptive therapy. When compared to patients with normal creatinine clearance, the subject incidence of hypocalcaemia following treatment with ZA was comparable in this analysis. This may be because the incidence of hypocalcaemia was reduced by lowering the dose of ZA in patients with impaired renal function [10].


In conclusion, antiresorptive medications like Xgeva 120 mg carry a known risk of hypocalcaemia. Before starting Xgeva or another antiresorptive medication, it is essential to treat hypocalcemia or any potential vitamin D deficiency, especially in patients who exhibit risk factors. Antiresorptive therapy-associated hypocalcemia can be avoided by educating patients on the significance of getting enough calcium and vitamin D, educating them on the relevant symptoms of hypocalcaemia, and keeping an eye on serum calcium levels, especially during the first few weeks of treatment. In this setting, hypocalcemia should be treated appropriately, including intravenous calcium administration if necessary. Hypocalcaemia is preventable and effectively manageable when it occurs with proactive and careful monitoring.


The author declares has no conflict of interest.


The author explained very well the topic.


  1. Yehuda Z, Alper A, Scott D, et al. Aneurysmal bone cyst of mandibular condyle: A case report and review of the literature. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2012; 40(8): 243-248.
  2. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  3. Mankin HJ, Hornicek FJ, Ortiz-Cruz E, et al. Aneurysmal bone cyst: a review of 150 patients. J Clin Oncol. 2005; 23(27): 6756-6762.
  4. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  5. Baig R, Eady J. Unicameral (simple) bone cysts. Southern Med J. 2006; 99(9): 966-976.
  6. Google Scholar, Crossref

  7. Rapp TB, Ward JP, Alaia MJ. Aneurysmal Bone Cyst. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2012; 20(4): 233-241.
  8. Google Scholar

  9. Rodrigues CD, Carlos E. Traumatic Bone Cyst Suggestive of Large Apical Periodontitis. J Endod. 2008; 34(4): 484-489.
  10. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  11. Kayani B, Sharma A, Sewell MD, et al. A Review of the Surgical Management of Extrathoracic Solitary Fibrous Tumors. Am J Clin Oncol. 2018; 41(7): 687-694.
  12.        Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  13. Choi H, Charnsangavej C, Faria SC. Correlation of computed tomography and positron emission tomography in patients with metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor treated at a single institution with imatinib mesylate: proposal of new computed tomography response criteria. J Clin Oncol. 2007; 25(13): 1753-1759.
  14. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  15. Taniguchi S, Ryu J, Seki M. Long-term oral administration of glucosamine or chondroitin sulfate reduces destruction of cartilage and up-regulation of MMP-3 mRNA in a model of spontaneous osteoarthritis in Hartley guinea pigs. J Orthop Res. 2012; 30(5): 673-678.
  16. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  17. Reginster J-Y, Bruyere O, Neuprez A. Current role of glucosamine in the treatment of osteoarthritis. Rheumatology. 2007; 46(5): 731-735.
  18. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  19. Scholtissen S, Bruyère O, Neuprez A, et al. Glucosamine sulphate in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: cost-effectiveness comparison with paracetamol. Int J Clin Pract. 2010; 64(6): 756-762.
  20. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref