Journal of Universal Surgery

  • ISSN: 2254-6758
  • Journal h-index: 7
  • Journal CiteScore: 0.79
  • Average acceptance to publication time (5-7 days)
  • Average article processing time (30-45 days) Less than 5 volumes 30 days
    8 - 9 volumes 40 days
    10 and more volumes 45 days
20+ Million Readerbase
Indexed In
  • Genamics JournalSeek
  • Directory of Research Journal Indexing (DRJI)
  • OCLC- WorldCat
  • Euro Pub
  • Google Scholar
Share This Page
Recommended Webinars & Conferences

Review Article - (2023) Volume 11, Issue 1

Automated Surgery in Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery: A Review

Rahbar Reza*
Department of Otology and Laryngology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
*Correspondence: Rahbar Reza, Department of Otology and Laryngology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA, Email:

Received: 02-Jan-2023, Manuscript No. IPJUS-23-13414; Editor assigned: 03-Jan-2023, Pre QC No. IPJUS-23-13414 (PQ); Reviewed: 17-Jan-2023, QC No. IPJUS-23-13414; Revised: 24-Jan-2023, Manuscript No. IPJUS-23-13414 (R); Published: 31-Jan-2023, DOI: 10.36648/2254- 6758.


Later headways in mechanical technology innovation have permitted more complex surgical strategies to be performed utilizing negligibly intrusive approaches. In this article, we surveyed the part of mechanical help in Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery. We highlight the points of interest of robot-assisted surgery and its clinical application in this field. Later progresses in gear and surgical procedures have made Negligibly Obtrusive Surgery (MIS) a well-tolerated and effective strategy in a few areas of surgery. It has a few points of interest over standard surgical approaches, counting more quick recuperation, lower rate of postoperative contamination, diminished torment, way better postoperative resistant work, and corrective comes about. In this way, Robotic-Assisted Surgery (RAS) has picked up ubiquity in a few surgical specialties and numerous teach are presently contributing in therapeutic mechanical innovation for applications in common, urological, cardiac, gynaecological, and neurological surgery. This unused and energizing innovation has been appeared to be secure, have superior or comparable results, and can be taken a toll viable when compared with routine surgical approaches. This has raised intrigued in its utilize in other surgical areas, such as otolaryngology and head and neck surgery. Head and neck and a few aviation route strategies have been related.


Surgery; Head; Neck; Otolaryngology


The primary mechanical surgical framework created was the Jaguar 560, which was utilized in 1985 to perform neurosurgical biopsies with expanded accuracy. Since this time, arrangement of robots have been created. Be that as it may, the as it were FDA endorsed and effectively promoted framework for Transoral Automated Surgery TORS for head and neck surgery is the da Vinci Surgical Robot (Natural Surgical Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA). This system has its roots within the National Air Transportation and Space Administration’s (NASA) crave to create a strategy to supply surgical care to circling space explorers by means of telepresence surgery. Intrigued in this innovation came from both the Stanford Investigate Organized and the US Army, which saw guarantee in bringing the innovation to the front line to supply surgical care to a injured trooper as before long as possible even with the specialist working remotely. From there on, in 1995, the Natural Surgical Organization was set up to create telerobotic frameworks for commercial open utilize [1].


The surgical cart (or slave unit) is prepared with four arms; one arm holds a 0° or 30°12 mm stereoscopic camera (with 2 optical channels, each 5 mm), and the other three arms hold 5 mm (pediatric estimate) or 8 mm (routine) EndoWrist rebellious (Instinctive Surgical Inc.), that are effectively conversely by surgical staff concurring to the surgeon’s crave and method requirement. The vision cart is prepared with two light sources, an insufflator, and equipment that produces the three-dimensional picture. The cart as a rule holds another screen for the collaborator surgeon. The surgeon’s comfort (or ace unit) shows two pictures, one for each eye. This makes a 3-dimensional picture that enormously makes strides profundity discernment inside the surgical field. In expansion, the comfort is the interface for the specialist to control the instrument, by controlling the hand controllers. The surgeon’s comfort is prepared with pedals to control the camera and instrument arm clutching [2, 3].

The 3-dimensional visualization and ten times amplification of the agent field improve the profundity of the field and the clarity of the tissue planes amid dismemberment. This may be particularly supportive amid head and neck surgery and pediatric surgery, since of the little measure of the surgical field and the failure to move the disobedient and the camera inside it. It can too offer assistance in recognizing tissue sorts in oncological dismemberment [4, 5].

Disposal of Physiologic Tremors and Scale Motion

The surgical framework disposes of the surgeon’s tremor through equipment and program channels. In expansion, developments can be scaled, whereby expansive hand developments can be deciphered into micromovements interior the agent field, permitting the specialist more exactness. Multiarticulated Instruments EndoWrist disobedient have 7 degrees of opportunity, which progresses ability, permitting maneuverability that approaches that of open surgery [6].

The depiction underneath applies to the TORS methods, in spite of the fact that not all strategies within the head and neck locale utilize this approach. (Other approaches are commented on in each method description.) Transoral Automated Surgery (TORS) is characterized as surgery performed by means of the verbal depth that employments a least of three automated arms and permits bimanual control of tissues. It was to begin with created by Weinstein and O’Malley, who have surveyed the possibility of this method utilizing the da Vinci Automated Framework. To minimize obstacle and maximize the communication between the specialist and his/her associates in TORS surgery, the surgeon’s cart ought to be found at the conclusion of the working room, permitting free space to maneuver the surgical cart that's set on the correct side of the understanding, inverse to the specialist. The back staff and instrument carts are found on the side of the quiet, inverse the specialist as well [7].

O’Malley Jr. started the TORS considers in canine and cadaveric models and connected the strategy to clinical hone. In 2006, three patients experienced robot-assisted transoral tongue base resection in a imminent clinical trial. In this ponder, the robot empowered the specialists to effectively distinguish the glossopharyngeal, hypoglossal and lingual nerves, as well as the lingual supply route. One T1 and one T2 squamous cell (AJCC cancer arranging: two occurrences of squamous cell carcinoma (one T1 and one T2) were enough resected with negative edges, great hemostasis, and no postoperative complications. The distinctive retractor sorts were surveyed to begin with amid the cadaveric portion of the ponder, and after that at the starting of each strategy performed in patients. The FK retractor accomplished the leading (versus Crowe Davis and Dingman retractors) tissue introduction and withdrawal. The same gather distributed another consider in which robot-assisted tonsillectomy was performed on 27 patients [8].


After preparatory considers surveying the achievability of TORS for oncologic resection, a arrangement of ponders were performed to look at the useful results of these methods. Most thinks about fundamentally report on oropharyngeal and verbal depth cancer, be that as it may, there are moreover case arrangement on hypopharyngeal and laryngeal danger treated with TORS. Failure due to imperfect get to has been detailed. Within consideration performed by Weinstein in 2010, as it were 3 of 47 patients were changed over to open surgery after endeavors fizzled to reach satisfactory introduction for resection. Indicators of a troublesome get to incorporate: retro- and micrognathia and trismus. Other thinks about illustrate comparable case avoidance rates, such as Boudreaux, who detailed 3 of 29, and Iseli found 5 of 54. Moore detailed no case avoidance due to unacceptable get to. A comprehensive pan endoscopy earlier to planning patients for TORS can distinguish unacceptable patients and decreased [9, 10].



Conflict of Interest



  1. Kalavakunta Jagadeesh Kumar, Gupta Vishal, Paulus Basil, Lapenna William (2014) an Unusual Cause of Transient Ischemic Attack in a Patient with Pacemaker. Case Reports in Cardiology 265759.
  2. Google Scholar, Crossref

  3. Brunner M (2004) Long-term survival after pacemaker implantation Prognostic importance of gender and baseline patient characteristics. European Heart Journal 25: 88-95.
  4. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  5. Bernstein AD, Camm AJ, Fisher JD, Fletcher RD, Mead RH, et al. (1993) North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology policy statement. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 16: 1776-1780.
  6. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  7. Mond HG, Sloman JG, Edwards RH (1982) the first pacemaker. PACE 5: 278-282.
  8. Google Scholar, Crossref

  9. Furman S, Szarka G, Layvand D (2005) Reconstruction of Hyman's second pacemaker. PACE 28: 446-453.
  10. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  11. Reynolds, Jorge (1988) The Early History of Cardiac Pacing in Colombia. PACE 11: 355-361.
  12. Record CO, Sleight P, Gunning AJ, Kenworthy-Browne JM, Richings M, et al. (1971) Treatment of chronic heart block with the Lucas induction coil pacemaker. Heart 33: 938-942.
  13. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  14. Furman S, Schwedel JB (1959) an intracardiac pacemaker for Stokes-Adams seizures. N Engl J Med 261: 943-948.
  15. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  16. Parsonnet V, Zucker IR, Gilbert L, Asa M (1962) an intracardiac bipolar electrode for interim treatment of complete heart blocks. Am J Cardiol 10: 261-265.
  17. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  18. C Esposito (2004) Incidence and management of hydrocele following varicocele surgery in children. J Urol 171: 1271-3.
  19. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

Citation: Reza R (2023) Automated Surgery in Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery: A Review. J Uni Sur, Vol. 11 No. 1: 104.