Journal of Universal Surgery

  • ISSN: 2254-6758
  • Journal h-index: 7
  • Journal CiteScore: 0.79
  • Average acceptance to publication time (5-7 days)
  • Average article processing time (30-45 days) Less than 5 volumes 30 days
    8 - 9 volumes 40 days
    10 and more volumes 45 days
20+ Million Readerbase
Indexed In
  • Genamics JournalSeek
  • Directory of Research Journal Indexing (DRJI)
  • OCLC- WorldCat
  • Euro Pub
  • Google Scholar
Share This Page

Short Communication - (2021) Volume 9, Issue 7

Coronary Bifurcations Techniques

Sushma Vakiti*

Department of Biotechnology, Osmania University, Hyderabad, Telangana, India

Corresponding Author:
Sushma Vakiti
Department of Biotechnology
Osmania University, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
E-mail: [email protected]

Received Date: July 30, 2021; Accepted Date: August 05, 2021; Published Date: August 10, 2021

Citation: Vakiti S (2021) Coronary Bifurcations Techniques. J Univer Surg Vol.9 No.7:35

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Universal Surgery

Short Communication

Coronary bifurcation stenosis addresses a typical finding during analytic coronary angiography, with an expected rate of about 20%. The horrible area of these injuries makes their percutaneous treatment intricate and testing, conceivably prompting early and late unfavorable occasions. To be sure, imperfect angioplasty results, for example, in the event of stent malapposition or under development, just as the powerlessness to cross the side branchonce sent the primary stent, may think twice about stream and increment the danger of both stent apoplexy and restenosis. Albeit current rules suggest the temporary methodology (i.e., embedding one stent in the fundamental branch, with sending of a second stent in the side branchonly whenever thought about vital), numerous two stent bifurcation procedures have been created to reestablish a more physiological life systems and to forestall intense and late side branch impediment [1].

Truth be told, two stent methods might be chosen in advance and be beneficial in those circumstances in which the side branch is sufficiently large to create hemodynamic or electric precariousness in case stream is compromised (i.e., >2.5 mm vessel distance across, seriously calcified illness, >10 mm injury augmentation into side branch). By and large, the decision of the stenting system depends on the administrator inclination and the anatomical highlights of the coronary tree. Numerous observational and randomized controlled preliminaries have been directed to clarify which stenting strategy has a superior long haul profile as far as clinical results like passing, myocardial localized necrosis, target sore and vessel revascularization or stent apoplexy [2].

Nonetheless, an unmistakable advantage of a bifurcation stenting procedure over the other had not been illustrated. Consequently, our gathering played out a precise survey and organization metaanalysis to evaluate which bifurcation method (counting Provisional Stenting, Double Kissing (DK) squash, Mini-smash, Culotte, Crush and T-stenting and Protrusion (TAP)) gives best long haul results. Strangely, aftereffects of the examination, including an aggregate of 4285 patients with bifurcation sores, showed that DK squash and Mini-pound beat different strategies by decreasing the pace of major cardiovascular occasions like demise, myocardial dead tissue and stroke, just as the frequency of target sore and target vessel revascularization and stent apoplexy. Moreover, we tracked down an expanded danger of stent apoplexy with Crush and Culotte method [3].

Our outcomes were in accordance with the outcomes by other 2 gatherings giving comparable, recommending a predominance of DK pound over different methods. Strangely, our investigation was the main one to discover additionally prevalence with the small pound method. DK pound method, albeit more perplexing on the grounds that requiring more strides to appropriately put the two stents in the fundamental and side branch enjoys the benefit to diminish the danger of carina contortion and to work with a simpler intersection of the side branch, expanding the way to appropriately foster the last kissing inflatable. Furthermore, the way that the method upholds keeping up with the guide wire in the principle branch all through the strategy may secure against losing the fundamental branch Moreover, our work additionally showed advantage with smaller than usual squash procedure. Albeit this was upheld by just one randomized controlled preliminary, we imagine that the less metal jutting into the fundamental vessel might be identified with these outcomes. Further examinations ought to be finished with respect to this bifurcation strategy.



  1. Louvard Y, Thomas M, Dzavik V, Hildick-Smith D, Galassi AR, et al. (2008) Classification of coronary artery bifurcation lesions and treatments: Time for a consensus! Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 71: 175-183.
  2. Collet C, Mizukami T, Grundeken MJ (2018) Contemporary techniques in percutaneous coronary intervention for bifurcation lesions. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther 16: 725-734.
  3. Gioia GD, Sonck J, Ferenc M, Chen SL, Colaiori I, et al. (2020) Clinical outcomes following coronary bifurcation PCI techniques: A systematic review and network meta-analysis comprising 5,711 patients. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 13: 1432-1444.