Flyer

Archives in Cancer Research

  • ISSN: 2254-6081
  • Journal h-index: 11
  • Journal CiteScore: 0.91
  • Journal Impact Factor: 0.6
  • Average acceptance to publication time (5-7 days)
  • Average article processing time (30-45 days) Less than 5 volumes 30 days
    8 - 9 volumes 40 days
    10 and more volumes 45 days
20+ Million Readerbase
Indexed In
  • China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI)
  • CiteFactor
  • OCLC- WorldCat
  • Publons
  • Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research
  • Google Scholar
  • Secret Search Engine Labs
Share This Page

Mini Review - (2022) Volume 10, Issue 6

DNA Repair Pathways are triggered to keep up Genetic Stability and Integrity

Agostinho Machado*
 
Department of Pharmacology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, University of Sao Paulo, Brazil
 
*Correspondence: Agostinho Machado, Department of Pharmacology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, University of Sao Paulo, Brazil, Email:

Received: 01-Jun-2022, Manuscript No. IPACR-22-133; Editor assigned: 03-Jun-2022, Pre QC No. IPACR-22-133; Reviewed: 17-Jun-2022, QC No. IPACR-22-133; Revised: 23-Jun-2022, Manuscript No. IPACR-22-133; Published: 30-Jun-2022, DOI: 10.36648/2254-6081.22.10.133

Abstract

Cancer order instability arises from numerous defects in DNA-repair machinery, that build cancer cells a lot of vulnerable to polymer targeting agents. The interrelatedness between polymer repair deficiency and therefore the multiplied impact of polymer targeting agents highlights the double-strand break (DSB) repair that contains the homologous recombination (HR) and non-homologous finish change of integrity (NHEJ) pathways. The polymer targeting agents area unit classified into 2 major groups: non-covalent polymer binding agents and valence DNA-reactive agents. Though these agents have well-known limitations, like resistance and secondary carcinogenesis risk, they're very necessary in today's real-life cancer medical care together with targeted medical care and therapy. Indeed, polymer targeting medicine area unit promising medicine with an exact application through the background of cancer-specific polymer repairs failure. Within the current review, the mechanisms of action of wide-ranging DNAtargeting agents, also because the modulation of polymer repair pathways to extend the DNA-damaging medicine efficaciousness area unit given. Finally, DNAtargeting- based therapies area unit mentioned considering risks, resistance and its uses within the medication preciseness era.

Keywords

Necrobiosis; Antineoplastic; Tumour; Carcinogenesis; Homologous Recombination

Introduction

Cancer may be a worldwide public ill health - one among the deadliest diseases with increasing incidence worldwide. Its range of cases will increase with increment, aging, and exposure to risk factors, like tobacco use, physical inactivity, excess weight, and procreative patterns. It’s been reduced in high-income countries (HIC) thanks to the amplification of screening and early detection. However, in low- and medium-income countries (LMIC), the incidence of cancer, as an example respiratory organ, breast, and body part cancers, has distended thanks to increased exposure to risk factors. The cancer care includes surgical process, radiation, therapy, and specific therapies. Indeed, nice efforts are applied to beat cancer medical aid challenges, like understanding molecular indicators of cancer for a personalised cancer genomic treatment.

DNA repair pathways are triggered to take care of genetic stability and integrity once class cells ar exposed to endogenous or exogenous DNA-damaging agents. The liberation of DNA repair pathways is related to the initiation and progression of cancer. because the primary anti-cancer therapies, radiation and chemotherapeutical agents induce necrobiosis by directly or indirectly inflicting DNA harm, deregulation of the DNA harm response could contribute to hypersensitivity or resistance of willcer cells to genotoxic agents and targeting DNA repair pathway can increase the growth sensitivity to cancer therapies. Therefore, targeting DNA repair pathways could also be a possible therapeutic approach for cancer treatment. a more robust understanding of the biology and also the regulative mechanisms of DNA repair pathways has the potential to facilitate the event of inhibitors of nuclear and mitochondria DNA repair pathways for enhancing antineoplastic impact of DNA damage-based medical aid [1-5].

The hallmarks of cancer square measure categorised in an exceedingly form of biological capabilities, that square measure distinctive from non-tumour cells. These talents embody sustaining proliferative communication, evading growth suppressors, enabling replicative immortality, resisting necrobiosis, inducement ontogenesis, activating invasion and metastasis, reprogramming of energy metabolism, evading immune destruction, tumour-promoting inflammation, and order instability and mutation

The hallmarks square measure associated with uncontrolled proliferation; so, as such associated with polymer replication, turning cancer cells a lot of liable to polymer targeting agents. In addition, ordering instability and mutation arise from various DNA-maintenance machinery defects. For example, this deficiency could also be on the detection of polymer harm and activation of polymer repair systems, and loss of telomeric polymer with pathology of enzyme, that is additionally cited as an indicator for sanctioning replicative immortality. From the 10 hallmarks enumerated by Hanahan and physicist, four of them indicate that cancer cells square measure a lot of sensitive to polymer targeting agents than non-cancer cells.

Discussion

This review discusses the mechanism of action of heterogeneous DNA-targeting agents, classifying them into 2 major groups: non-covalent polymer binding agents and valence DNA-reactive agents. Hence, the most polymer repair pathways tuned in to these agents square measure pondered, furthermore because the modulation of those pathways to extend the DNA-damaging drugs’ effectuality. The cons and professionals of this kind of medical care square measure additional mentioned especially secondary carcinogenesis risk and its importance in cancer medical care within the medication exactitude era [6-10].

Cancer order instability arises from various defects in DNArepair machinery that create cancer cells a lot of vulnerable to deoxyribonucleic acid targeting agents. The relation between deoxyribonucleic acid repair deficiency and also the enhanced impact of deoxyribonucleic acid targeting agents highlights the double-strand break (DSB) repair, that contains the homologous recombination (HR) and non-homologous finish connection (NHEJ) pathways. The deoxyribonucleic acid targeting agents area unit classified into 2 major groups: non-covalent deoxyribonucleic acid binding agents and valence DNA-reactive agents. Though these agents have well-known limitations, like resistance and secondary carcinogenesis risk, they're very necessary in today's real-life cancer medical aid together with targeted medical aid and therapy. Indeed, deoxyribonucleic acid targeting medication area unit promising medicine with an exact application through the background of cancer-specific deoxyribonucleic acid repair failure. Within the current review, the mechanisms of action of heterogeneous DNA-targeting agents, yet because the modulation of deoxyribonucleic acid repair pathways to extend the DNA-damaging medication effectiveness area unit conferred. Finally, DNA-targeting-based therapies area unit mentioned considering risks, resistance and its uses within the medication exactitude era.Genomic instability is one amongst the foremost pervasive characteristics of growth cells and is maybe the combined impact of deoxyribonucleic acid injury, tumourspecific deoxyribonucleic acid repair defects, and a failure to prevent or stall the cell cycle before the broken deoxyribonucleic acid is passed on to female offspring cells. Though these methods drive genomic instability and ultimately the unwellness process, they additionally give therapeutic opportunities a far better understanding of the cellular response to deoxyribonucleic acid injury won't solely inform our information of cancer development however additionally facilitate to refine the classification yet because the treatment of the unwellness [11-15].

Acknowledgement

I would like to thank my professor for his support and encouragement.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that there is no Conflict of interest.

References

  1. Dan Z, Tang BXXY, Ming S Y, Zhang J W (2015) The interplay between DNA repair and autophagy in cancer therapy. Cancer Biol Ther 16: 1005-1013.
  2. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  3. Anna S, Slyskova J, Loizou JI (2021) Targeting the DNA Repair Enzyme Polymerase θ in Cancer Therapy Trends Cancer. Trends Cancer 7: 98-111.
  4. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  5. Kaina B, Christmann M (2019) DNA repair in personalized brain cancer therapy with temozolomide and nitrosoureas. DNA Repair (Amst) 78:128-141.
  6. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  7. Brown S J, Carrigan B O, Stephen P J, Timothy A Y (2017) Targeting DNA Repair in Cancer: Beyond PARP Inhibitors. Cancer Discov 7: 20-37.
  8. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  9. Patrick G P, Chad T, Mills B G, Timothy A Y (2019) State-of-the-art strategies for targeting the DNA damage response in cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 16:81 -104.
  10. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  11. Lord J C, Ashworth A (2012) The DNA damage response and cancer therapy. Nature  481:287-94.
  12. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  13. Hosoya N, Miyagawa K (2014) Targeting DNA damage response in cancer therapy. Cancer Sci 105:370-388.
  14. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  15. Helleday T, Eva P, Lundin C, Ben H, Ricky A S (2008) DNA repair pathways as targets for cancer therapy. Nat Rev Cancer 8:193-204.
  16. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  17. Nicola J C (2012) DNA repair dysregulation from cancer driver to therapeutic target. Nat Rev Cancer 12: 801-817.
  18. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  19. Roos P W, Thomas D A, Bernd K (2016) DNA damage and the balance between survival and death in cancer biology. Nat Rev Cancer 16:20-33.
  20. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  21. Young K, Starling N, David C (2016) Targeting deficient DNA damage repair in gastric cancer. Expert Opin Pharmacother 17:1756-1766.
  22. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  23. Qun L, Turner M T, Alfred Yung Y K, Chen K, Wei Z (2014) Role of AKT signaling in DNA repair and clinical response to cancer therapy. Neuro Oncol 16:1313-1323.
  24. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  25. Felix D, Lisa T, Reinhardt C H (2014) Cancer-specific defects in DNA repair pathways as targets for personalized therapeutic approaches. Trends Genet 30:326-339.
  26. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  27. John M F, Mustapha B El (2013) Targeting DNA repair mechanisms in cancer. Pharmacol Ther 137:298-308.
  28. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  29. Casorelli I, Bossa C, Margherita B (2012) DNA damage and repair in human cancer: molecular mechanisms and contribution to therapy-related leukemias. Int J Environ Res Public Health 9:2636-2657.
  30. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

Citation: Machado A (2021) DNA Repair Pathways are triggered to keep up Genetic Stability and Integrity. Archives Can Res, Vol.10 No. 6: 133.