Flyer

Annals of Clinical and Laboratory Research

  • ISSN: 2386-5180
  • Journal h-index: 19
  • Journal CiteScore: 5.42
  • Journal Impact Factor: 4.64
  • Average acceptance to publication time (5-7 days)
  • Average article processing time (30-45 days) Less than 5 volumes 30 days
    8 - 9 volumes 40 days
    10 and more volumes 45 days
+44 7460731551
Awards Nomination
Indexed In
  • Genamics JournalSeek
  • China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI)
  • CiteFactor
  • Directory of Research Journal Indexing (DRJI)
  • Publons
  • Euro Pub
  • Google Scholar
  • SHERPA ROMEO
  • Secret Search Engine Labs
  • Zenodo
Share This Page

Research Article - (2018) Volume 6, Issue 4

Effect of Bipolar Sealants on Total Hip Arthroplasty Using the Direct Anterior Approach

Joseph Benjamin Yida Kang*, Kenon Chua, Andy Khye Soon Yew, William Yeo and Hee Nee Pang

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore

*Corresponding Author:
Joseph Benjamin Yida Kang
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery
Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
Tel: +6597891777
E-mail: rainman_2012@yahoo.com

Received Date: Nov 26, 2018; Accepted Date: Dec 17, 2018; Published Date: Dec 24, 2018

Citation: Yida Kang JB, Chua K, Soon Yew AK, et al. (2018) Effect of Bipolar Sealants on Total Hip Arthroplasty Using the Direct Anterior Approach. Ann Clin Lab Res Vol.6 No.4:271. DOI: 10.21767/2386-5180.100271

Visit for more related articles at Annals of Clinical and Laboratory Research

Abstract

Introduction: To determine the effect of bipolar sealant on transfusion rates in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) using the direct anterior approach (DAA).

Methods: Fifty-nine patients in total were recruited for the study. The first group (n:37) underwent THA DAA using the conventional bipolar diathermy and the second (n:22) group underwent THA DAA with the aid of aquamantys bipolar sealant. Mean difference in postoperative drop in haemoglobin levels were charted and transfusion rates were compared. The statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 2.0 software for windows.

Results: The use of bipolar sealants did not significantly reduce hemoglobin drop (p>0.05). It did, however, significantly reduce the rate of transfusion (p=0.013)

Conclusion: Our study suggests that the use of bipolar sealants were superior to conventional bipolar cautery in patients undergoing primary THA using the DAA, causing a significant drop in the need for post-operative packed cell transfusions. Hence, the use of bipolar sealant is recommended in primary THA using the DAA.

Keywords

Bipolar sealant; Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA)

Introduction

Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) is associated with a large amount of blood loss and a high transfusion rate [1]. It has been demonstrated that blood loss during THA ranged from 700 ml to 2000 ml and the transfusion rate is 16% to 27% [1-4]. The blood loss and subsequent transfusion will increase the risk of morbidity, length of hospital stay, and add additional cost to patients. Therefore, effective control of blood loss after THA is of paramount importance for postoperative management of patients. There are several blood-preservation techniques used to minimize postoperative drop in haemoglobin for patients undergoing THA: hemostatic agents, erythropoietic agents, minimally invasive surgery, intraoperative and postoperative salvage of blood with reinfusion, hypotensive or epidural anesthesia, and preoperative autologous blood donation [5-7]. Our study aims to illustrate the advantage that the bipolar sealant has in reducing blood loss in comparison to a conventional monopolar diathermy.

In direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty, there are various potential sources of blood loss which may contribute to the substantial post-operative bleeding. Of particular concern in this surgical approach is the ascending branch of the lateral femoral circumflex artery, which has been commonly identified as a source which requires haemostasis [8]. To achieve haemostasis intra-operatively, suture ligation or electrical cautery are commonly used. Standard electrocautery is commonly adopted to achieve intraoperative haemostasis. However, standard electrocautery has been reported to cause severe burns and severe tissue necrosis in patients, and operating room fires; moreover, viruses and carcinogens have been detected in the smoke generated by the device during surgery [9-12]. In addition, investigators have also noted that skin incision healing is quite slow, because of which, they argued, application of electrocautery should be limited to reduce the postoperative complications [13]. In comparison to conventional bipolar cautery, a new blood loss device known as a bipolar sealant is able to provide haemostasis at lower temperatures (<100°C) [6-10]. The bipolar sealant delivers radiofrequency energy in a saline medium for haemostatic sealing and coagulation of tissue. The advantage of this bipolar sealant is to induce coagulation of small vessels at about lower than conventional bipolar cautery, thereby minimizing thermal necrosis [14-18]. It is also used in other surgeries such as hepatic transplantations, cirrhotic liver resections, cholecystectomies, and oncological surgery [17,19,20].

To our knowledge, there is no literature available that has assessed the impact of a bipolar sealant on THA using DAA. We decided to perform this study to assess and compare the efficacy of using bipolar sealants in direct anterior approach of total hip arthroplasty against another group of patients using conventional bipolar diathermy and evaluate the postoperative transfusion rates and drop in haemoglobin levels.

Methods

This is a retrospective international review board-approved single institution study under a single fellowship trained arthroplasty surgeon with data obtained from patients from April 2015 to March 2017. They underwent total hip arthroplasty using the direct anterior approach. The first group of patients (n: 37) had conventional bipolar cautery used during the operation and the second group of patients (n: 22) underwent the operation using the bipolar sealant.

The first group of patients had mean age of 63.2 +/- 12.6 years old and consisted of 17 males and 19 females. Most patients had comordities of hypertension and hyperlipidemia. There were 2 smokers. 9 patients had aspirin and 1 patient was on warfarin pre-operatively. The second group of patients had mean age of 60.4 +/- 13.1 years old and there were 8 males and 15 females. The patients also usually have hypertension and hyperlipidemia. There were also 2 smokers and 1 ex-smoker. 10 patients were on aspirin and one patient was on ticlodipine. A summary of the demographics of the patients are available in Table 1.

Variables Bipolar Sealant Conventional Monopolar
Number of patients, n 22 35
Age (years) 60.4 +/- 13.1 63.2 +/- 12.6
Gender 8 males
15 females
17 males
19 females
Anticoagulation medication 10 aspirin, 1 ticlodipine 9 aspirin, 1 warfarin
comorbidities 12 (Hypertension + Hyperlipidemia)
1 rheumatoid arthritis
1 rheumatic heart disease
1 mixed connective tissue disease
1 IGA nephropathy renal failure patient
19 (Hypertension + Hyperlipidemia)
3 CVA patients
1 ischemic heart disease patient
1 renal transplant patient
Smokers 2 3

Table 1: Patient demographics in the two groups of patients.

For haemoglobin levels, we obtained pre-operative values and charted the post-operative values on day of surgery and post-operative day 1. The post-operative drop in haemoglobin levels was recorded, the difference in the pre-operative and post-operative haemoglobin levels using both methods were recorded and compared; and the need for transfusion of blood products post-operatively was documented. Transfusion was ordered if the patient’s post-operative haemoglobin levels were less than 9.0 g/dL. The results were then charted and SPSS version 2.0 was used to run the tests to look for significance.

Results

The independent sample mann-whitney – U test was used to measure the significance between the two groups. We found that the level of haemoglobin drop between the two groups was not significant (0.618, p>0.05) but there was a significant difference in the need for post-operative transfusion in the group which had the bipolar sealant group (p=0.013) compared to the group that used the conventional bipolar diathermy (Table 2).

 Variables Bipolar Sealant Conventional Monopolar p-value
Pre-op Hb 13.5 13.1 0.2
Hb Drop 2.8 2.98 0.618
Need for transfusion 0% 25% 0.013

Table 2: Comparision of haemoglobin values and need for transfusion of bipolar sealant vs conventional monopolar diathermy.

Discussion

Total hip arthroplasty using the direct anterior approach is a very successful intervention. It allows early weight bearing and quick return to joint function. This is because of the musclesparing approach adopted by this surgeon. Less soft tissue dissection is performed in comparision to other more traditional approaches such as the hardinge approach or the posterior approach. Primary total hip replacement is complicated by perioperative blood loss ranging in amount from 1,000 to 2,000 ml [1-4]. Blood transfusion was needed to correct anemia in 3% to 50% of patients [21]. There are several blood-preservation techniques are in regular clinical use: hemostatic agents, erythropoietic agents, minimally invasive surgery, intraoperative and postoperative salvage of blood with reinfusion, hypotensive or epidural anesthesia, and preoperative autologous blood donation [16-18].

Haemostatic agents such as transexamic acid, fibrin sealant, thrombin based sealant can be used to minimize blood loss. Erythropoeitc agents such as the bipolar sealant is an effective means of haemostasis, but of date there is no literature which supports its use in direct anterior approach of total hip arthroplasty. This current study compares the efficacy of the bipolar sealant with a conventional bipolar cautery and its impact on blood loss and transfusion rates.

The most recent iteration of this technology genre, the Aquamantys© System is a bipolar sealing device (BPS 6.0-VT Tissue Link Medical, Dover, NH), which combines a bipolar electrosurgical generator with a rotary peristaltic saline pump [22]. The current hand-held device has both the aforementioned combined into a single unit. Electrothermal bipolar vessel sealants produce a hemostatic seal by applying radiofrequency energy in combination with continuouslyflowing saline irrigation at the electrode tip directed at a vessel, thereby denaturing the blood vessel wall’s elastin and collagen and causing contraction of vascular collagen, occlusion of blood flow, coagulation and subsequent soft tissue sealing at a much lower temperature (<100°C) than occurs with standard electrocautery [23-25]. The saline flow serves to cool the temperature of tissues, and serves as a conductive fluid to distribute energy over a larger, more even surface of the vessel while performing haemostatic sealing [15,26]. Typically, the depth of penetration of these salinecoupled bipolar sealing technologies is only 2mm or less 26. By contrast, conventional monopolar electrocautery risks producing an eschar and tissue charring from temperatures exceeding 300°C, and thereby poses a risk of subsequent postoperative bleeding with eschar breakage or detachment [26].

Indeed, in THA, pretreatment of areas expected to bleed is as important as coagulating large open muscle and bone beds from the femoral canal or extended trochanteric osteotomy sections. Of note, it is imperative in these procedures to avoid contact with skin edges, subcutaneous tissues, tendons and ligaments with the bipolar sealing devices due to potential harm from their shrinking effect on collagen [27].

In this study, we have showed that bipolar sealant can reduce the need for transfusion post-operatively, and the result was statistically significant. (p=0.013). This result also means that the bipolar sealant may reduce the economic cost involved in the use of blood products during transfusion.

The bipolar sealant has been shown to not significantly reduce the drop in haemoglobin level (p>0.05) as compared to the conventional bipolar cautery. This is because bone is a special tissue that contains mostly inorganic components that are poor conductors of electricity [28]. This is one of the reasons that lead to a large amount of intra-operative blood loss since electrocautery is unable to effectively stop blood loss from bleeding bone [28].

In addition, there have also been other studies which show that bipolar sealant has the ability to decrease post-operative pain and swelling, resulting in quicker recoveries from arthroplasty [26].

Our study has a few limitations. Firstly, this is a retrospective case-control and there is no randomization of patients; so the surgeon and the patients were aware of the instruments used. Secondly, the numbers involved could be larger to increase the power of the study.

Conclusion

Total hip arthroplasty using the direct anterior approach is one of the most successful surgical interventions. Patients have early ambulatory function and faster return of joint function. Bipolar sealants are an effective adjunct in total hip arthroplasty performed using this approach. Our study showed that there is a significantly lower rate of transfusion when the bipolar sealant is used in comparision to conventional bipolar cautery. (p=0.013). Further prospective, randomized controlled trials which involve larger number of patients can be undertaken in future to study the effect of bipolar sealants on lowering blood transfusion rates when using direct anterior approach in total hip arthroplasty.

23820

References

  1. Bierbaum BE, Callaghan JJ, Galante JO, Rubash HE, Tooms RE, et al. (1999) An analysis of blood management in patients having a total hip or knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 81: 2-10.
  2. Guerra JJ, Cuckler JM (1995) Cost effectiveness of intraoperative autotransfusion in total hip arthroplasty surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res 315: 212-222.
  3. Nuttall GA, Santrach PJ, Oliver WC, Horlocker TT, Shaughnessy WJ, et al. (1996) The predictors of red cell transfusions in total hip arthroplasties. Transfusion 36: 144-149.
  4. Woolson ST, Watt JM (1991) Use of autologous blood in total hip replacement. A comprehensive program. J Bone Joint Surg Am 73: 76-80.
  5. Biesma DH, Marx JJ, Wiel VA (1994) Collection of autologous blood before elective hip replacement. A comparison of the results with the collection of two and four units. J Bone Joint Surg Am 76: 1471-1475.
  6. Bridgens JP, Evans CR, Dobson PM, Hamer AJ (2007) Intraoperative red blood-cell salvage in revision hip surgery. A case-matched study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89: 270-275.
  7. Goodnough LT, Monk TG (1998) Erythropoietin therapy in the perioperative setting. Clin Orthop Relat Res 357: 82-88.
  8. Grob K, Monahan R, Gilbey H, Yap F, Filgueira L (2015) Distal extension of the direct anterior approach to the hip poses risk to neurovascular structures: an anatomical study. J Bone Joint Surg AmĀ  97: 126-132.
  9. Hollmann R, Hort CE, Kammer E, Naegele M, Sigrist MW, et al. (2004) Smoke in the operating theater: an unregarded source of danger. Plast Reconstr Surg 114: 458-463.
  10. Nercessian OA, Wu H, Nazarian D, Mahmud F (1998) Intraoperative pacemaker dysfunction caused by the use of electrocautery during a total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 13: 599-602.
  11. Ratcliffe CJ (2004) Development and implementation of a bloodless medicine and surgery program. J Healthc Manag 49: 405-409.
  12. Tarver HA, Oliver SK, Ramming GJ, Englemann B (2000) Techniques to maintain a bloodless field in lower extremity surgery. Orthop Nurs 19: 65-73.
  13. Ritter EF, Demas CP, Thompson DA, Devereux DF (1990) Effects of method of hemostasis on wound-infection rate. Am Surg 56: 648-650.
  14. Marulanda GA, Ulrich SD, Seyler TM, Delanois RE, Mont MA (2008) Reductions in blood loss with a bipolar sealer in total hip arthroplasty. Expert Rev Med Devices 5(2): 125-131.
  15. Marulanda GA, Ragland PS, Seyler TM, Mont MA (2005) Reductions in blood loss with use of a bipolar sealer for hemostasis in primary total knee arthroplasty. Surg Technol Int 14: 281-286.
  16. Mankin KP, Moore CA, Miller LE, Block JE (2012) Hemostasis with a bipolar sealer during surgical correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Spinal Disord Tech 25(5): 259-263.
  17. Geller DA, Tsung A, Maheshwari V, Rutstein LA, Fung JJ, et al. (2005) Hepatic resection in 170 patients using saline-cooled radiofrequency coagulation. HPB (Oxford) 7: 208-213.
  18. Marulanda GA, Krebs V, Bierbaum BE, Goldberg VM, Ries M, et al. (2009) Hemostasis using a bipolar sealer in primary unilateral total knee arthroplasty. Am J Orthop 38: E179-183.
  19. Blansfield JA, Rapp MM, Chokshi RJ, Woll NL, Hunsinger MA, et al. (2012) Novel method of stump closure for distal pancreatectomy with a 75% reduction in pancreatic fistula rate. J Gastrointest Surg 16: 524-528.
  20. Siegel HJ, Sparks DR, Casillas MA, Hong H, Dunham WH (2008) The use of bipolar hemosealing technology in orthopedic oncology: safety and clinical impact. Orthopedics 28.
  21. Toy PT, Kaplan EB, McVay PA, Lee SJ, Strauss RG, et al. (1992) Blood loss and replacement in total hip arthroplasty: a multicenter study. The Preoperative Autologous Blood Donation Study Group. Transfusion 32: 63-67.
  22. Zeh A, Messer J, Davis J, Vasarhelyi A, Wohlrab D (2010) The Aquamantys system-an alternative to reduce blood loss in primary total hip arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty 25: 1072-1077.
  23. Barsoum WK, Klika AK, Murray TG, Higuera C, Lee HH, et al. (2011) Prospective randomized evaluation of the need for blood transfusion during primary total hip arthroplasty with use of a bipolar sealer. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93: 513-518.
  24. Heniford BT, Matthews BD, Sing RF, Backus C, Pratt B, et al. (2001) Initial results with an electrothermal bipolar vessel sealer. Surg Endosc 15: 799-801.
  25. Lim CS, Jang JY, Lee SE, Lee YJ, Kang MJ, et al. (2013) Comparison of various methods of vessel ligation: what is the safest method? Surg Endosc 27: 3129-3138.
  26. Derman PB, Kamath AF, Lee GC (2013) Saline-coupled bipolar sealing in revision total knee arthroplasty for infection. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 42: 407-411.
  27. Rosenberg AG (2007) Reducing blood loss in total joint surgery with a saline-coupled bipolar sealing technology. J Arthroplasty 22: 82-85.
  28. Ji-Kang M, Qiang HZ, Dong HL, Heng L, Guo P (2016) The efficacy of bipolar sealer on blood loss in Total Hip Arthroplasty. Medicine 95: p1-p7.