Archives in Cancer Research

  • ISSN: 2254-6081
  • Journal h-index: 11
  • Journal CiteScore: 0.91
  • Journal Impact Factor: 0.6
  • Average acceptance to publication time (5-7 days)
  • Average article processing time (30-45 days) Less than 5 volumes 30 days
    8 - 9 volumes 40 days
    10 and more volumes 45 days
20+ Million Readerbase
Indexed In
  • China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI)
  • CiteFactor
  • OCLC- WorldCat
  • Publons
  • Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research
  • Google Scholar
  • Secret Search Engine Labs
Share This Page

Mini Review - (2022) Volume 10, Issue 7

Emerging Metabolomics tools to check Cancer Metastasis

George Mellissa*
Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen and German Cancer Consortium, Partner Site, Essen, Germany
*Correspondence: George Mellissa, Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen and German Cancer Consortium, Partner Site, Essen, Germany, Email:

Received: 29-Jun-2022, Manuscript No. ipacr-22-12916; Editor assigned: 01-Jul-2022, Pre QC No. ipacr-22-12916; Reviewed: 15-Jul-2022, QC No. ipacr-22-12916; Revised: 22-Jul-2022, Manuscript No. ipacr-22-12916; Published: 29-Jul-2022, DOI: 10.36648/2254-6081-10.7-137


Metastasis is to blame for ninetieth of deaths in patients with cancer. Understanding the role of metabolism throughout metastasis has been restricted by the event of strong and sensitive technologies that capture metabolic processes in metastasizing cancer cells. We tend to discuss these technologies on the market to check metabolism in primary and pathological process cancer cells and metabolic interactions between cancer cells and also the tumour microenvironment (TME) at completely different stages of the pathological process cascade. We tend to establish blessings and downsides of every methodology and discuss however these tools and technologies can more improve our understanding of metastasis. Studies work the advanced metabolic rewiring of various cells victimisation progressive metabolomics technologies have the potential to reveal novel biological processes and therapeutic interventions for human cancers. Metabolomics rewiring of cancer cells throughout metastasis.


Metabolomics technologies; Diagnostic prognosis; Cancer metastasis cancer metabolism analytical techniques


Metabolism is central to all or any cellular functions, as cellular metabolism ultimately drives the generation and usage of ATP needed for cellular activity. Changes at the metabolic level will cause many diseases, as well as cancer. Cancer cells will activate and suppress completely different metabolic pathways. What is more, metabolic changes known in cancer cells compared with non-cancer cells provide potential metabolic vulnerabilities that will be therapeutically modulated to decrease cancer progression [1]. Over the past few years, there has been outstanding progress in understanding the metabolic regulation of cancer cells, particularly within the context of primary tumour metabolism. However, a comprehensive understanding of the metabolic regulation of cancer cells throughout metastasis (see Glossary) remains AN open space of active analysis. New developments in mass spectroscopic analysis technologies and analysis will effectively reveal the metabolic options of metastasizing cancer cells. These new technologies will capture special and temporal variations in metabolic activity of metastasizing cancer cells. Use of those metabolic technologies is complemented by acceptable application of relevant metastasis models. Metastasis may be a advanced method that involves uncontrolled proliferation of cancer cells at a primary web site native invasion into encompassing tissue, trauma into the blood or lymphatics, (iv) transportation through circulation extravasation into distant tissues, and colonisation of secondary organs (Box 1) [4]. Metastasis through this {metastatic pathologic method pathological process} cascade may be a extremely inefficient process as most cancer cells don't survive, however some endure metabolic variations to optimize survival in these harsh environments. Even though metabolomics technologies have created it more and more clear that cancer cells acquire some metabolic traits for his or her proliferation and maintenance through the pathological process cascade [2-5]. It’s still difficult to characterize the heterogeneous metabolic states of not solely cancer cells however conjointly immune and stromal cells, so as to develop metabolic inhibitors to hinder metastasis formation.

Sensitive and strong metabolomics technologies area unit vital for detection the metabolic rewiring of the few cancer cells on the market for study at numerous steps of the pathological process cascade from: (i) heterogeneous primary tumors, current tumour cells (CTCs), and distant pathological process organ sites because of enhancements in instrumentation, it's currently doable to research the metabolomic profile of tiny numbers of cancer during this review, we tend to summarize the newest metabolomic technologies on the market to research neoplastic cell metabolism, with a stress on metastasizing cancer cells in presymptomatic models and in patients. We tend to discuss the benefits and downsides of every methodology and challenges to be overcome. Quantitative metabolomics has long been a robust analytic tool for evaluating metabolites in biological samples like several ‘-omics’ sciences, metabolomic technologies area unit perpetually evolving, driving new developments in analytical techniques, models, software, and procedure strategies to enhance sensitivity and specificity. Techniques developed decades past like nuclear magnetic resonance spectrum analysis, gas chromatography–mass spectroscopic analysis (GC-MS), and liquid chromatography–MS (LC-MS) have proved to be necessary tools for the detection and quantification of metabolites in cancer metastasis [5,6].


These techniques need a comparatively sizable amount of cancer cells and can't distinguish the metabolic heterogeneousness on a single-cell level. Characterizing the metabolic heterogeneousness at intervals a tumour is very important as variations in subsets of willcer cells at intervals a tumour can influence the extent of economical metastasis and potential response to therapies. The presence or absence of specific metabolic qualities in subsets of cancer cells is also helpful for predicting that cancer cells area unit seemingly to expeditiously metastasise, and therefore might function biomarkers for diagnostic prognosis. Single-cell analysis is an especially promising technology that gives insight into cellular heterogeneousness and dynamics in individual cells and has been used to live transcriptomic, proteome, and metabolomic abundance [7]. In primary and pathological process tumors, single-cell metabolomics is wont to reveal metabolic heterogeneousness at intervals a neoplastic cell population. SCM has been employed in pathological process skin cancer and first and pathological process tumours of head and neck cancers to demonstrate that tumour and non-tumor cells at intervals the TME have completely different metabolic activity that weren't detected in bulk tumor tissues [8]. SCM, still as low-cell range metabolomics, is especially helpful within the analysis of CTCs in blood because of high intrapatient heterogeneousness and pertinence as a liquid diagnostic test biomarker for metastasis for instance, current skin cancer cells were shown to possess down regulated purine biogenesis compared with primary tumour cells. However, metabolic analysis of CTCs remains difficult. Isolation of CTCs is usually performed during a flow cytometer. However, the isolation method will cause metabolic stress to the individual cells because of shear forces and pressure.

Therefore, direct sorting into correct termination solutions (e.g., methanol) and short time periods area unit counselled to avoid metabolic disturbances [9]. Another for enrichment of CTCs is that the ParsortixTM Cell Separation container System, a micro fluid platform that captures single CTCs supported size, that's a gentler methodology compared with flow cytometer. However, this micro fluid system has lower flow-through compared with flow cytometer, and there also are limitations to the numbers of CTCs that may be collected in one container. In summary, SCM may be a quickly progressing field with recent important advances in strong sampling, ionization strategies, and substance detection. Continued development of sample preparation protocols to extend the metabolic integrity of analyzed cells can provide extra enhancements to SCM analyses. After transit through the blood, cancer cells adapt their metabolism to invade and outgrow at distant organs. Metabolic identification of cancer cells in distant organs is of utmost importance to forestall metastasis formation and elucidate why some cancer cells metastasise to specific organs. Therefore, in place MS technologies have appeared as valuable technologies to characterize the metabolism of cancer cells within the pathological process surroundings [10].

Matrix-assisted optical maser desorption/ionization–MS imaging (MALDI-MSI) is rising technique that enables single-cell metabolic analysis of label-free processed samples and histologic tissue samples (in situ). MALDI-MSI may be a matrix-based methodology that may distinguish between metabolism from tumour, immune, and stromal cells in place, therefore adding special resolution to metabolomics study data at a single-cell level To reason the various cell subtypes and their metabolism, assay or technique of consecutive tissue sections is imaged and just about incorporated to discover the cell subtype and its corresponding metabolites. This technology has the potential to uncover new therapeutic targets by revealing however microenvironments at completely different organs, still as completely different nutrients on the market in these microenvironments, influence cancer metastasis in place [11].

Changes in matrix chemistry and advanced instrumentation have allowed MALDI-MSI to be applied in cancer studies to quantify metabolites, discover biomarkers for medical specialty and prognostics, and perceive drug bioavailability at intervals tumors. Recently, Scupakova and colleagues elegantly applied MALDI-MSI to check glycosylation of carcinoma cells throughout pathological process progression in tissue microarrays, demonstrating that pathological process breast cancers have higher levels of N-glycan’s compared with primary tumors. MALDI-MSI has conjointly been applied in primary mucous membrane carcinomas as a prophetical tool for the presence or absence of node metastasis [12]. What is more, in adenocarcinoma models, author and colleagues victimisation MALDI-MSI have shown that there are a unit fewer phospholipids in stromal and non-cancer epithelial tissue compared to adenocarcinoma cells [13]. These foundational studies, and others, offer proof that MALDI-MSI may be a extremely promising technology for the identification, comparison of primary tumors and metastasis for medical aid call, still as for the quantification of metabolites at intervals a sample.

However, MALDI-MSI has limitations like low sensitivity; some matrices don't seem to be ready to ionize a spread of analyses, like low relative molecular mass ions. Second, MALDI-MSI will cause substance delocalization by matrix tissue mounting that reduces the specificity of the metabolites detected at individual special points. These limitations are overcome by enhancements in matrix composition and sample preparation concerning the tactic of selection for matrix application. to boot, matrix-free in place metabolomics technologies also are on the market as well as action electrospray particularization–mass spectroscopic analysis imaging (DESI-MSI) and secondary ion mass spectroscopic analysis (SIMS) [14,15]. whereas SIMS and MALDI-MSI have a single-cell/subcellular special resolution, DESIMSI doesn't and encompasses a special resolution. Therefore, the selection of methodology depends on the mass-to-charge quantitative relation (m/z) detection vary, sensitivity, time needed for sample preparation, and information analysis [42]. To date, MALDI remains the foremost in style ionization technique for MSI because of its high sensitivity and convenient spectra analysis.


The field of cancer metabolomics analysis has greatly evolved with the event of the new technologies and tools highlighted during this review. These technologies have helped to spot metabolic alterations in primary tumors and distant pathological process sites that are applied within the clinic for cancer nosology and medical care. However, the foremost recent advances in these technologies have allowed the analysis of metastasizing cancer cells. These techniques have the potential to uncover why just some cancer cells survive within the blood throughout metastasis, however their metabolism changes, and why they spread to specific secondary organs. Still, enhancements in matter detection sensitivity, characterization of ‘malignant’ metabolic profiles of metastasizing cancer cells for patient stratification, prognosis, and medical care, stay to be elucidated. Over ensuing decade, uncovering and targeting the metabolic pathways in metastasizing cancer cells can still reveal new therapeutic targets with potential for reducing pathological process unfold to enhance patient prognosis and survival.


I would like to thank my professor for his support and encouragement.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.


  1. Martinez-Reyes L,Chandel N S (2021) Cancer metabolism: looking forward. Nat Rev Cancer 21: 669-680.
  2. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  3. Luengo A,Dan Y G, Matthew G Vander H (2017) Targeting metabolism for cancer therapy. Cell Chem Biol24: 1161-1180.
  4. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  5. T.M.J.Evers,Mazène H, Sander J T Ron M A H, Stefan S et al. (2019) Deciphering metabolic heterogeneity by single-cell analysis. Anal Chem 91: 13314-13323.
  6. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  7. A.W.Lambert,Diwakar R P, Robert A W (2017) Emerging biological principles of metastasis Cell168:  670-691..
  8. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  9. DeBerardinis R J, Chandel N S (2020) We need to talk about the Warburg effect. Nat Metab2: 127-129.
  10. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  11. O.Warburg, Wind F, Negelein E (1927) The metabolism of tumors in the body J Gen Physiol8: 519-530. .
  12. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  13. J.G.Gill,Elena P, Sean J M (2016) Cancer, oxidative stress, and metastasis. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant  Biol81:163-175.
  14. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  15. Mehlen P,Puisieux A (2006) Metastasis: a question of life or death. Nat Rev Cancer 6: 449-458.
  16. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  17. Tasdogan A,Brandon F, Vijayashree R, Jessalyn M U, Bo S et al. (2020) Metabolic heterogeneity confers differences in melanoma metastatic potential. Nature577: 115-120.
  18. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  19. Bergers G,Fendt S M (2021) The metabolism of cancer cells during metastasis. Nat Rev Cancer 21: 162-180.
  20. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  21. Ganesh K,Massague J (2021) Targeting metastatic cancer. Nat Med27: 34-44.
  22. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  23. Luo X,Li L (2017) Metabolomics of small numbers of cells: metabolomic profiling of 100, 1000, and 10000 human breast cancer cells. Anal Chem 89:11664-11671.
  24. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  25. Ubellacker J M, Alpaslan T, Vijayashree R, Bo S, Evann C M (2020)et al. Lymph protects metastasizing melanoma cells from ferroptosis Nature585: 113-118.
  26. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  27. Kim J,DeBerardinis R J (2019) Mechanisms and implications of metabolic heterogeneity in cancer. Cell Metab30: 434-446.
  28. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  29. M.Fessenden (2016) Metabolomics: small molecules, single cells. Nature 540: 153-155.

    Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

Citation: Mellissa G (2022) Emerging Metabolomics tools to check Cancer Metastasis. Archives Can Res, Vol.10 No. 7:137.