Flyer

Health Systems and Policy Research

  • ISSN: 2254-9137
  • Journal h-index: 10
  • Journal CiteScore: 1.70
  • Journal Impact Factor: 1.84
  • Average acceptance to publication time (5-7 days)
  • Average article processing time (30-45 days) Less than 5 volumes 30 days
    8 - 9 volumes 40 days
    10 and more volumes 45 days
Awards Nomination 20+ Million Readerbase
Indexed In
  • China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI)
  • Cosmos IF
  • Scimago
  • Directory of Research Journal Indexing (DRJI)
  • OCLC- WorldCat
  • Publons
  • Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research
  • Euro Pub
  • Google Scholar
  • J-Gate
  • SHERPA ROMEO
  • International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
Share This Page

Perspective - (2023) Volume 10, Issue 5

The complex landscape of health ethics: Balancing autonomy, beneficence and justice

Simone Hadley*
 
Department of Health Care Management, Jogg University, Coventry, United Kingdom
 
*Correspondence: Simone Hadley, Department of Health Care Management, Jogg University, Coventry, United Kingdom, Email:

Received: 04-Sep-2023, Manuscript No. iphspr-23-14191; Editor assigned: 07-Sep-2023, Pre QC No. P-14191; Reviewed: 21-Sep-2023, QC No. Q-14191; Revised: 03-Oct-2023, Manuscript No. R-14191; Published: 19-Oct-2023, DOI: -

Introduction

Well-being morals, a dynamic and consistently developing field, assumes an essential part in the medical care industry. It envelops a wide exhibit of moral standards and contemplations that guide medical care experts, policymakers, and people in settling on moral choices in regards to clinical consideration and general wellbeing. This exposition will dive into the multi-layered scene of wellbeing morals, zeroing in on key standards like independence, helpfulness and equity. We will investigate how these standards are applied in true medical services situations and examine the continuous moral difficulties in the medical care area.

Description

Autonomy in health ethics

Autonomy, the principle of respecting an individual's right to make decisions about their own health, lies at the heart of health ethics. Informed consent is a prime example of how autonomy is upheld in healthcare. It ensures that individuals have the right to make decisions regarding their own medical treatment after receiving comprehensive information about the potential risks and benefits.

However, autonomy is not without its ethical dilemmas. For instance, what happens when an individual's autonomous choices appear to be detrimental to their health, should healthcare providers respect an individual's choice to refuse a life-saving treatment. This scenario raises complex questions about the boundaries of autonomy and the ethical responsibilities of healthcare professionals.

One solution to this dilemma is the concept of "substituted judgment," wherein healthcare providers or family members make decisions on behalf of an incapacitated individual, based on their known preferences and values. While this approach respects autonomy, it introduces another layer of complexity in determining whether the substituted decision accurately reflects the individual's wishes.

Beneficence in health ethics

The principle of beneficence underscores the ethical obligation to act in the best interest of patients and to promote their well-being. Healthcare providers are bound by this principle to prioritize the health and welfare of their patients. The ethical responsibility to "do good" is ingrained in the hippocratic oath and is central to the medical profession.

Balancing beneficence with autonomy can be challenging. Consider the case of a terminally ill patient who is suffering greatly. The patient may wish to forego aggressive life-sustaining treatments to avoid further suffering, thus exercising autonomy. However, healthcare professionals must weigh this against the principle of beneficence, which may dictate that providing palliative care or pain relief is in the patient's best interest.

Moreover, beneficence extends beyond individual patient care to broader public health considerations. For instance, the ethical obligation to promote vaccination campaigns to protect public health demonstrates the application of beneficence on a societal level, even if it involves infringing upon individual autonomy.

Justice in health ethics

Justice in health ethics revolves around the equitable distribution of healthcare resources and access to medical care. It demands fairness, non-discrimination and a commitment to reducing health disparities. The ethical principle of justice is particularly relevant in today's world, where access to quality healthcare is often unequal and vulnerable populations suffer from disproportionate health burdens.

One of the most prominent issues related to justice in healthcare is the concept of healthcare rationing. In situations of resource scarcity, such as during a pandemic or in a triage setting, healthcare providers may face the moral dilemma of deciding which patients receive life-saving treatment. These decisions must be guided by principles of justice, ensuring that individuals are not discriminated against based on factors such as age, race or socioeconomic status.

The principle of justice also underscores the need for healthcare policies that address health disparities. In many countries, marginalized communities face disparities in healthcare access and health outcomes. Ethical healthcare systems strive to address these inequities by implementing policies and interventions that aim to rectify disparities.

Challenges in health ethics

While the principles of autonomy, beneficence and justice provide a foundation for ethical decision-making in healthcare, real-world scenarios often present complex challenges that require careful ethical analysis.

End-of-life decisions: Decisions regarding end-of-life care, including withholding or withdrawing life-sustaining treatment, can be emotionally and ethically challenging. Healthcare providers must navigate the fine l ine b etween respecting an individual's autonomy and promoting beneficence.

Resource allocation: The a llocation o f l imited h ealthcare resources, such as ventilators during a pandemic, poses ethical dilemmas. Decisions must be guided by principles of justice, but implementing these principles fairly can be contentious.

Emerging technologies: Advances in medical technology, such as gene editing and artificial intelligence, raise questions about their ethical use and potential consequences, including issues of consent, privacy and justice.

Healthcare disparities: Reducing healthcare disparities is an ongoing challenge, particularly in marginalized communities. Ethical healthcare systems must strive to address these disparities through policy interventions.

Healthcare access: The issue of healthcare access remains a critical concern, with disparities in access to healthcare services among different socioeconomic groups and regions.

Conclusion

Health care management is a dynamic field that faces numerous challenges in the current healthcare landscape. Rising costs, regulatory compliance, patient-centered care, workforce shortages and technological advancements present complex issues that require strategic approaches to address. Healthcare managers can navigate these challenges by implementing strategies such as population health management, value-based care, telemedicine integration, data analytics and lean management.