Flyer

Archives in Cancer Research

  • ISSN: 2254-6081
  • Journal h-index: 14
  • Journal CiteScore: 3.77
  • Journal Impact Factor: 4.09
  • Average acceptance to publication time (5-7 days)
  • Average article processing time (30-45 days) Less than 5 volumes 30 days
    8 - 9 volumes 40 days
    10 and more volumes 45 days
Awards Nomination 20+ Million Readerbase
Indexed In
  • China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI)
  • CiteFactor
  • OCLC- WorldCat
  • Publons
  • Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research
  • Euro Pub
  • Google Scholar
  • J-Gate
  • Secret Search Engine Labs
  • International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
  • Zenodo
Share This Page

The impact of interval colorectal cancer on life expectancy and estimated life year loss in a nationwidescaled 10-year cohort in Taiwan

Joint Event on 36th World Cancer Conference & 3rd Edition of International Conference on Colorectal Cancer
October 11-13, 2018 Zurich, Switzerland

Tzu-Chun Chen, Shu-Fen Su, Wei-Ying Chen, Hsiu-Chi Cheng, Wei-Chun Cheng, Jung-Der Wang and Bor-Shyang Sheu

Tainan Hospital, Taiwan National Cheng Kung University, Taiwan

Posters & Accepted Abstracts: Arch Cancer Res

Abstract:

Background & Aims: The long-term outcomes of interval colorectal cancer (ICRC) varied in previous studies without accounting for lead time bias. This nationwide cohort analysis estimates expected years of life lost (EYLL) to adjust lead time bias and comparison between patients with ICRC and detectable colorectal cancer (DCRC). Methods: Patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) registered in Taiwan Cancer Registry during 2002 to 2009 were enrolled, including 22,169 CRC confirmed within 6 months after colonoscopy grouped as detected CRC (DCRC) and 1,653 CRC diagnosed during 6-60 months after a negative colonoscopy grouped as ICRC. All patients were followed up until the end of 2011. We simulated age- and sex-matched referents from life tables in Taiwan National Vital Statistics using Monte Carlo method. Lifetime survival function of the cancer patients was obtained from extrapolation of logit transform of the survival ratio between cancer cohorts and age- and sex-matched referents. The LE (life expectancy) and EYLL were calculated after stratification by genders and tumor stages. Results: Patients with ICRC had consistently shorter LE’s than those of DCRC after stratification by genders and stages (male in stage 2: 12.8 vs. 15.2 years, p<0.001; in stage 3: 6.6 vs. 11.0 years, p<0.001; in stage 4: 2.2 vs. 3.9 years, p<0.001 & female in stage 2: 14.1 vs. 17.5 years, p<0.001; in stage 3: 13.6 vs. 15.3 years, p<0.001; in stage 4: 2.2 vs. 3.7 years, p<0.001). After adjustment for age at diagnosis and/or lead time bias, the EYLL was not different between ICRC and DCRC (p>0.05). As compared to DCRC, ICRC had older age, more on proximal sites, and associated with previous endoscopic polypectomy procedures (p<0.001). Conclusion: The ICRC can lead into a shorter LE, but not EYLL after adjustment for lead time bias. Concerning ICRC predisposes to occur in the proximal colon and/or after endoscopic procedure, the assurance of colonoscopy quality and close surveillance to risky group shall be crucial to reduce ICRC and to thus possibly improve LE.

Biography :

E-mail:

sylvie233@gmail.com