Flyer

Journal of FisheriesSciences.com

  • Journal h-index: 26
  • Journal CiteScore: 15.26
  • Journal Impact Factor: 1.40
  • Average acceptance to publication time (5-7 days)
  • Average article processing time (30-45 days) Less than 5 volumes 30 days
    8 - 9 volumes 40 days
    10 and more volumes 45 days
20+ Million Readerbase
Indexed In
  • Academic Journals Database
  • Genamics JournalSeek
  • The Global Impact Factor (GIF)
  • China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI)
  • CiteFactor
  • Electronic Journals Library
  • Centre for Agriculture and Biosciences International (CABI)
  • Directory of Research Journal Indexing (DRJI)
  • OCLC- WorldCat
  • Proquest Summons
  • Publons
  • Advanced Science Index
  • Google Scholar
  • Secret Search Engine Labs
  • ResearchGate
Share This Page
Recommended Webinars & Conferences

Research - (2022) Volume 16, Issue 11

Efficacy of varying inclusion levels of oxalic acid on growth performance, carcass composition of Oreochromis niloticus and challenge test with Escherichia coli

Adebayo S.F11*, Omosowone O.O2 and Dada A.A2
 
1Department of Fisheries and Aquaculture, Faculty of Agriculture, Adekunle Ajasin University, Akungba- Akoko, Ondo State, Nigeria
2Department of Fisheries and Aquaculture Technology, The Federal University of Technology, Akure, Ondo State, Nigeria
 
*Correspondence: Adebayo S.F1, Department of Fisheries and Aquaculture, Faculty of Agriculture, Adekunle Ajasin University, Akungba- Akoko, Ondo State, Nigeria, Email:

Received: 02-Oct-2022, Manuscript No. ipfs-22-13063; Editor assigned: 04-Oct-2022, Pre QC No. ipfs-22-13063 (PQ); Reviewed: 18-Oct-2022 Revised: 24-Oct-2022, Manuscript No. ipfs-22-13063 (R); Published: 31-Oct-2022, DOI: 10.36648/1307- 234X.22.16.115

Abstract

The study investigated the efficacy of varying inclusion levels of oxalic acid on growth performance, carcass composition of Oreochromis niloticus and challenge test with Escherichia coli. O. niloticus of mean weight 7.00g ± 0.04 were fed with varying oxalic acid supplemented diets for 90 days. At the expiration of the feeding trials significant variations was recorded on growth performance indices and carcass composition of fish. The best growth was recorded in OAC4 which also had best protein retention. The culture water parameters (DO2, temperature, pH) were with the required limits. The study demonstrated that oxalic acid at 1.5% was able to improve growth and had highest survival in challenge test with E. coli.

Keywords

Oxalic acid; growth performance; carcass composition; Oreochromis niloticus

Introduction

Aquaculture is one of the fastest growing food production sectors proposed to meet the increasing demand for animal protein, and to overcome human challenges related to diseases and low immunity as a result of protein deficiency. This sector is expected to increase human protein consumption to boost immunity against infections and related diseases. Aquaculture production is predicted to grow to between 400 - 500 million tonnes by 2030 and to keep up with demand, the potential solution to this move aquaculture to the next level, as suitable new locations for freshwater production become scarce (FAO, 2020). This can only be achieved with good water quality, nutritionally complete steady feeds of low cost that optimizes growth and reduces the probability of diseases and parasite infestations thereby improving fish health. Aquaculture was introduced to Nigeria in the 1950s with the culture of Tilapia [1]. The sector which started on a subsistence level has grown to be one of the most significant in the Sub-Saharan Africa. Nutrients in aquafeed play critical roles in aquaculture because, by influencing fish health, growth, reproduction, production and management cost. Nutrients are substances that an organism needs to live and grow or a substance that provides nourishment for growth or reproduction, which must be taken from its environs or obtained from its food [2]. Nutrients are used to build and repair tissues, regulate body processes and convert energy (ATP) for daily muscle coordination. It has been reported that dietary supplementation of organic acids increases the bioavailability of minerals, including phosphorus, magnesium, calcium and amino acid in catfish and tilapia [3-5]. The search for feed additives is important point for aquaculture as wide varieties of natural growth promoters, including plant extracts, probiotics and organic acids have been applied globally with reasonable success [6-7]. The supplementation of organic acid as additive to basal ingredients in feed formulation has significantly increased body weight of aquatic organism and other animals. Oxalates are organic compounds with two carboxyl groups. They are made up of short chain fatty acids (SCFAs) and volatile fatty acids, or weak carboxylic acids similar to butyric, formic, citric, benzoic, lactic and malic acids (Koh et al, 2016). Oxalic acids in animal feed were reportedly used on piglets to complement their limited capacity to maintain a low gastric pH and thus prevent digestive problems [8-10]. Therefore, oxalic acid or their salts would be a promising feed additive for aquatic organisms to improve growth performance and health status without the fear of resistance as a result of accumulation. Therefore, this work focued on growth performance, carcass composition of O. niloticus fed with varying inclusion levels of oxalic acid supplemented the diets and challenge with E. coli.

Materials and Methods

The research work was carried out at the Department of Fisheries and Aquaculture Technology Teaching and Research Farm, The Federal University of Technology, Akure, (FUTA) Ondo State, Nigeria. Proximate analysis of feed and fish were carried out at Animal Production and Health (APH) Laboratory, School of Agriculture and Agricultural Technology, FUTA.

Experimental Diets and Preparation

The test ingredient, Oxalic acid was procured from an accredited dealer in Nigeria. Five iso-nitrogenous diets of 35 % crude protein were formulated to contain oxalic acid at different inclusion levels of: 0 (OAC1), 0.5 (OAC 2), 1.0 (OAC 3), 1.5 (OAC4) and 2.0 (OAC5) g100g-1. Prior to diet preparation, ingredients were analyzed at the Central Research Laboratory, FUTA for proximate compositions. Basic ingredients such as fishmeal, soybean meal, groundnut cake (GNC), yellow maize meal, wheat offal, Cod-liver oil, vitamins and mineral premixes, and cassava starch (binder) were purchased from a licensed feed marketer. All ingredients were weighed based as indicated on the Table 1. Furthermore, ingredients were grinded using electric motor (KPG0154) and reweighed to precision using electronic Citizen’s weighing balance (Model PB3002). Ingredients were then thoroughly mixed using Hammer mixer and pelleted following appropriate procedure in a Horbart A-2007 pelleting machine (Hobart Ltd, London, UK). Pellets product was sundried at ambient temperature (28-30°C) and later packed in polythene bags prior to use.

Ingredient Dietary Treatment
Control(D1) D2 D3 D4 D5
Fish meal 28.13 28.13 28.13 28.13 28.13
Soybean meal 18.75 18.75 18.75 18.75 18.75
Groundnut cake 9.38 9.38 9.38 9.38 9.38
Maize 20.25 20.25 20.25 20.25 20.25
Wheat 13.50 13.50 13.50 13.50 13.50
Cod liver-oil 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Vit. & Mineral mixture/Premix 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
Cassava starch 5.00 4.50 4.00 3.50 3.00
*Oxalic acidic (gkg-1) 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00
Proximate Analysis Composition (100 %)
Moisture content 14.04 10.97 10.63 11.05 11.45
Crude Protein 35.16 35.11 35.21 35.30 35.11
Crude Ash 12.19 12.35 12.37 12.85 13.21
Crude Lipid 9.72 8.27 7.53 7.87 8.50
Crude fibre 6.06 5.96 6.74 5.21 6.01
NFE 22.83 27.30 27.54 27.91 25.55

Table 1. Gross Composition of the Experimental Diets (g/100g) for O. niloticus (dry matter).

Experimental Fish

Three hundred (300) apparently healthy Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) fingerlings of mean weight 7.00g 0.04g were procured from the Teaching and Research Farm, Department of Fisheries and Aquaculture Technology, The Federal University of Technology, Akure. Experimental fish were acclimated to laboratory conditions for 14 days, and fed with farm-processed feed before the commencement of the feeding trials. Fish were starved for 24 hours, prior to being placed on experimental diets, with proximate compositions also analyzed.

Experimental Design and Set up

The experimental design was a complete randomized design (CRD) with all experimental samples homogenous, while the only source of variation is the test ingredient (Oxalic acid). An indoor experimental set-up of fifteen (15) glass tanks (70 x 45 x 45) cm with 60-litres water capacity were used for the experiment following standard bioassay procedures (APHA, 1990). Each unit was fitted with 50Hz aerator of 120W, (Coresun model: ACO-008) and powered electrically for an average of 15-18 hours per day. The source of culture water was from borehole situated on the Teaching and research farm.

Experimental Procedure

Apparently healthy fish with mean weight 7.00±0.04g were distributed at a rate of 15 fish per tank, into 15 glass aquarium tanks in triplicates. Fish were fed at 5% body weight in two equal portions twice daily between 08.00 – 09:00 and 16:00 – 17:00 hours GMT for 90 days. Uneaten feeds were siphoned every morning using a pressure sucking pipe. Water was partially (25 %) drained and replaced with fresh water daily and totally drained twice a week. Fish in experimental units were batch weighed at 2 weeks internal and feeding regimen readjusted based on change in body weight. Some water quality parameters were monitored on weekly basis using appropriate instruments. Temperature was measured using Search Tech Instrument thermometer, pH; Pen type pH meter and Dissolve oxygen; DO Meter Type (Labtech model: AVI – 660).

Experimental Analyses: At the expiration of the feeding trials growth performance evaluation were carried out using the following indices;

i. Weight Gain (WG) (g) = W2 - W1

Where; W2 and W1 are the final and initial body weight of fish respectively;

ii. Specific Growth Rate (SGR)

This was calculated from data on changes of body weight over a given time intervals

image

Where; W1 and W2 are logarithms of initial and final fish weight respectively, and T is the number of experimental days. %d-1

iii. Feed intake (FI)

It was obtained by adding biweekly mean feed intake (DFI) of the fish under each treatment for the experimental period.

FI(g) = quantity of feed fed x experimental period

iv. Feed Conversion Ratio (FCR)

image

v. Feed Efficiency Ratio (FER)

image

vi. Percentage Weight Gain (PWG)

image

vii. Survival (%)

image

Carcass Composition

Samples of fish were taken from each treatment tank at the end of acclimated and feeding trial for the initial and final proximate carcass analyses respectively. The proximate analysis was carried out according to the standard methods of AOAC (2005).

Challenge test with Enterotoxigenic Bacteria (Escherichia coli)

An immuno-competence test was conducted at the end of the feeding trials. Fifteen fish were randomly selected from each of the treatments (5 fish per tank) and introduced into 50 ml/l of broth culture of pathogenic strain of E. coli (1.7 x 109 cells/ml). Clinical signs, post-mortem lesions and mortalities was monitored for 9 days and recorded.

Statistical Analysis

Data collected were subjected to one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and general linear mode function of Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS version 23.0). The treatment means were separated where there was a significant different using Duncan’s multiple range test (Duncan 1955) at significance level of (p ≤ 0.05) and values were expressed as means ± standard error.

Results

The effects of oxalic acid on growth performance and nutrient utilization of O. niloticus fed oxalic acid supplemented diets is presented on Table 2. There were no significant variations (p>0.05) between the initial weights of the fish, which means that the weights were homogenous, no biasness was introduced from the initial weights. There were significant variations (p<0.05) in the growth evaluation indices measured in fish fed on the control and test diets. Significant variations (p<0.05) were observed in the final weight, weight gain, feed conversion ratio (FCR), feed efficiency ratio (FER) and specific growth rate (SGR) in OAC1, OAC2 and OAC5, but there was no significant different between the treatment OAC3 and OAC4 (P>0.05). Mortality was recorded in fish fed OAC1 and OAC2, OAC3 while OAC4 and OAC5 percentage survival is 100% the challenge test (Figure 1). Table 3 revealed the whole body composition of O. niloticus at the beginning and at the end of the feeding trial. There were significant variations (p<0.05) between the initial and final body compositions of fish with respect to moisture, lipid, fat and crude protein. There were no significant variations (p>0.05) in crude lipid of the fish on tested diets, except OAC4 which was different from other treatments. The initial body composition of O. niloticus had the highest moisture content, closely followed by OAC5 and the least in OAC3 (Tables 3-5), Also results of water parameters obtained during the experimental trials were: dissolved oxygen concentration, 6.00 – 6.53mg/l, pH, 8.03 – 8.60 and temperature, 27.30 – 27.64.

figure

Figure 1: Percentage survival of O. niloticus challenge with E. Coli.


Parameter
OAC1 OAC2 OAC3 OAC4 OAC5
Initial Mean Weight (g) 7.01±0.01a 7.00±0.01a 7.00±0.01a 7.00±0.01a 7.01±0.01a
Final Mean Weight (g) 19.23±0.16a 22.07±0.17c 23.87±0.20d 26.06±0.14d 20.62±0.13b
Mean Weight Gain (g) 12.22±0.16a 15.07±0.17c 16.88±0.75d 19.06±0.05d 13.61±0.13c
Mean Feed Intake (g) 31.60±0.07a 32.20±0.05a 32.42±0.04ab 32.88±0.04b 31.05±0.03a
FCR (g) 2.58±0.04d 2.09±0.03b 1.87±0.03a 1.65±0.01a 2.32±0.02c
FER (g) 0.38±0.59a 0.47±0.57c 0.53±0.75d 0.60.55±0.39d 0.43±0.39b
SGR (%day-1) 0.49±0.00a 0.55±0.00c 0.59±0.01d 0.63±0.00d 0.52±0.01b
PWG(%day-1) 1.94±0.03a 2.39±0.03c 2.68±0.0d 2.74±0.02d 2.16±0.02b
Survival (%) 85.33±3.84a 90.78±2.22b 95.78±2.22ab 97.78±2.22b 85.22±2.22a

Table 2. Growth performance of Oreochromis niloticus fed various levels ofOxalic Acid supplemented diets (Mean±SE).

Parameters Initials OAC1 OAC2 OAC3 OAC4 OAC5
Moisture 6.83 ±0.01c 7.80±0.01e 7.94±0.01f 6.32±0.01a 6.66±0.04b 6.91±0.01d
Ash 15.77±0.01e 15.77±e 14.61±0.06c 15.13±0.01d 13.83±0.01a 14.10±0.02b
Fat 12.17±0.02a 12.67±ab 13.50±c 12.32±0.01b 13.4±0.01c 13.24±0.02bc
Protein 47.05±0.02b 46.13±a 47.69±0.02 c 50.35±0.01e 52.02±0.01f 49.39±0.01d
NFE 18.18±0.02d 17.65±0.49d 16.07±0.39c 15.65±0.36b 14.07±0.03a 16.38±0.05c

Table 3. Whole body composition of Oreochromis niloticus (dry matter) fed varying levels ofoxalic acid supplemented diets(Mean±S.E).

Parameter OAC1 OAC2 OAC3 OAC4 OAC5
DO2 (mg/l) 6.00 ±0.12a 6.17 ±0.09a 6.73 ±0.03b 6.53 ±0.09b 6.53 ±0.09b
pH 8.60 ±0.06b 8.07 ±0.15a 8.20 ±0.11a 8.40 ±0.03ab 8.03 ±0.14a
Temperature (C) 27.4. ±0.06ab 27.43 ±0.67ab 27.50 ±0.06b 27.33 ±0.03ab 27.30 ±0.06a

Table 4. Water quality parameters in experimental units Oreochromis niloticus fed Oxalic acid supplemented diets.

Parameter OAC1 OAC2 OAC3 OAC4 OAC5
Stock 15 15 15 15 15
Mortality 15 10 5 0 0
Survival (%) 0 30 70 100 100

Table 5. Challenge test using O. niloticus

Discussion

Growth is one of the major factors used in aquaculture for evaluating nutrient utilization in fish nutrition. It was observed in this study that growth slowed down at the onset of the experiment with gradual increase in weight gain. There were significant variations (p<0.05) in most of growth indices measured at the end of the feeding trial. The highest weight was recorded in O. niloticus fed diets 4, signifying better nutrient utilization when compared to other treatment, the trend fish growth was proportional to weight gain, feed intake (FI), feed conversion ratio (FCR), and protein efficiency ratio (PER) of butyric acid supplemented diets on O. niloticus at 1.5% inclusion shows highest significant growth parameters when compared with those fed with controls diet [11]. The FCR and SGR also proportionate to C. gariepinus fed varying levels of ascorbic acid and iron nanoparticles that indicates a significant different p<0.05 in protein efficiency ratio [12]. In addition; Hassaan et al. (2014) put reported that O. niloticus fed with 1 % ca-lactate supplemented diet had higher growth, increased FI, and improved FCR and PER than the control group. Furthermore Ng et al. (2009) submitted that the use of butyric acid improved the feed intake, gut and gastrointestinal tract activity of red hybrid tilapia. Ramli et al. (2005) also opined that the inclusion of potassium salt of formic acid at 2 % in tilapia diets led to an increase in weight gain by 18.6%. This positive weight gain trend in this study is attributed to oxalic acids supplementation in fish diet, which reduced the pH level in the stomach, thereby providing a remedy to the problem of feed digestion. Other factors such as species and physiological age, experimental fish, type and level of organic acids, diet composition, and culture conditions may influence growth- promoting effects in aquaculture fish species. However, this finding is contrary to that of Magdy et al. (2017) who reported that O. niloticus fed with malic acid blend and organic salt was not significant different at 0.5%, 1.0% and 1.5% supplementation in terms of final weight, weight gain and specific growth rate. According to Da-Neves (2020), the effect of organic acids or organic salts depend on fish species, sources and inclusion levels which probably reflect in different nutrient utilization or digestive processes.

Addition of oxalic acid in O. niloticus diets revealed that growth was not linear as fish fed at 2.0% supplementation level had a lower weight gain when compare with those fed at 1.5%. Proximate or chemical analysis is frequently used to determine the influence of feed on fish body composition. The results of proximate analysis of whole fish body composition showed significant variations (p<0.05) when compared in the parameters with the initials and CTR. The low moisture content in fish body is a good quality of preservation of their shelf life. A higher protein composition is an indication that the protein to energy ratio used in the diets was in the right proportion, so there was no sparing of protein for energy in the feeding trial. More protein indicates an added value to the nutritional quality of the fish fed with oxalic- acid supplemented [13]. Reported significant variation in whole body composition of O. niloticus carcass fed with varying levels of butyric acid supplemented diets. This finding is similar to that of [14] who reported lower fat and ash contents in O. niloticus fed fumaric supplemented diets when compared with the control. Magdt et al. (2017) also reported that the use of oxalic and malic acid blend (OAB 1:1) in O. niloticus at 1.0% gave the highest protein and ash contents and lowest lipid content when compared with the control.

Water is the habitat of the fish, where different function take place, hence its importance in every experiment. Water parameters measured during experiment varied dissolved oxygen ranges 6.00 – 7.23mg/l, pH (7.02 – 8.03) and Temperature (26.17– 27.50). These variations were within the acceptable ranges recommended for the culture and rearing of tilapia [15,16]. It could therefore be inferred that experimental diets did not affect the water quality negatively nor led to water deterioration in all the experimental units.

Conclusion

This study had demonstrated that supplementation of oxalic acid probably increased the epithelial layer of intestine and thus increased diffusion of nutrients into the tissue to improve fish growth and did not pose any negative impact on carcass quality. Hence supplementation of O. niloticus diets with oxalic acid at 1.5% indicates the best protein retention, survival and percentage weight gain per day. Carcass analysis of the whole body illustrated that the dietary organic acid influenced the nutrient retention in experimental fish. Fish farmers should therefore be enlightened on the use of organic acids in fish diets. Also government should be encouraged to reduce tax on Organic acid or make it available at subsidized rates to fish farmer as plant fertilizers. Subsequent research should be on the use of oxalic acid on other fishes to establish further comparative analysis of its effect in aquaculture fish species and a combination of oxalic acids and prebiotics could also be explored.

Acknowledgement

No acknowledgement

Conflict of interest

Author declares no conflict of interest.

REFERENCES

  1. Watson R, Pauly D (2001) Systematic distortions in world Fisheries catch trends. Nature 414(6863): 534-536.
  2. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  3. Azevedo Santos Valter M, Pelicice Fernando Mayer, Lima-Junior Dilermando Pereira, Magalhães André Lincoln Barroso, Orsi Mario Luis, et al (2015) Agostinho Angelo Antonio How to avoid fish introductions in Brazil: education and information as alternatives. Natureza Conservação 13 (2): 123-132.
  4. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  5. Håstein T, Scarfe A D, Lund V L (2005) Science-based assessment of welfare: Aquatic animals. OIE Revue Scientifique Et Technique 24 (2): 529-47.
  6. Google Scholar, Indexed at

  7. Chandroo KP, Duncan IJH, Moccia RD (2004) Can fish suffer? Perspectives on sentience, pain, fear and stress. Appl Anim Behav Sci 86 (3-4): 225-250.
  8. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  9. Conte FS (2004) Stress and the welfare of cultured fish. Appl Anim Behav Sci 86 (3-4): 205-223.
  10. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  11. Huntingford F A, Adams C, Braithwaite V A, Kadri S, Pottinger T G, et al. (2006) Current issues in fish welfare (PDF). J Fish Biol 68 (2): 332-372.
  12. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  13. Hammer J, Kraak MH, Parsons JR (2012) Plastics in the marine environment: the dark side of a modern gift. Rev Environ Contam Toxicol 220: 1-44.
  14. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  15. Jambeck Jenna R, Geyer Roland, Wilcox Chris, Siegler Theodore R, Perryman Miriam, et al. (2015) Andrady Anthony, Narayan Ramani, Law Kara Lavender, Plastic waste inputs from land into the ocean. Science 347: 768-771.
  16. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  17. Jin Yuanxiang, Xia Jizhou, Pan Zihong ,Yang Jiajing, Wang Wenchao, et al. (2018) Polystyrene microplastics induce microbiota dysbiosis and inflammation in the gut of adult zebrafish. Environ Poll 235: 322-329.
  18. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  19. Rastelli Marialetizia, Cani Patrice D, Knauf Claude (2019) the Gut Microbiome Influences Host Endocrine Functions. Endo Rev 40(5): 1271-1284.
  20. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  21. Kannan Kurunthachalam, Vimalkumar Krishnamoorthi (2021) A Review of Human Exposure to Microplastics and Insights into Microplastics as Obesogens. Front in Endo 12: 724989.
  22. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  23. Weatherdon Lauren V, Magnan Alexandre K, Rogers Alex D, Sumaila U Rashid, Cheung William W L, et al. (2016) Observed and Projected Impacts of Climate Change on Marine Fisheries, Aquaculture, Coastal Tourism, and Human Health: An Update. Frontiers in Marine Science 3.
  24. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  25. Doney, S C (2006) the Dangers of Ocean Acidification (PDF). Sci Am (3): 58-65.
  26. Google Scholar, Crossref

  27. Fabry Victoria J, Seibel Brad A, Feely Richard A, Orr James C (2008) Impacts of ocean acidification on marine fauna and ecosystem processes. ICES J Mar Sci 65 (3): 414-432.
  28. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  29. Stenseth Nils (2010) Ecological forecasting under climate change: the case of Baltic cod. Proceedings: Biological Sciences 277 (1691): 2121-2130.
  30. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  31. Chivers William J, Walne Anthony W, Hays Graeme C (2017) Mismatch between marine plankton range movements and the velocity of climate change, Nature Communications. Nat Co 8(1):44-84.
  32. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

Citation: Gour M (2022) Effects of Varying Inclusion Levels of Oxalic Acid Supplemented Diets on Growth Performance and Carcass Composition of Oreochromis Niloticus Challenged with Escherichia Coli. J Fish Sci, Vol. 16 No. 11: 115.